The Bwog
Ask Bwog: First of the Semester Edition

Because we know you haven't heard enough about Phi Beta Kappa lately, Bwog investigates how one becomes a member of the illustrious society in the first place.

The bad news? There doesn't seem to be any magic formula for becoming a member of the elite squad known as Phi Beta Kappa. According to the PBK Society's incredibly thorough website, "The ideal Phi Beta Kappan has demonstrated intellectual integrity, tolerance for other views, and a broad range of academic interests." More specifically, to be eligible for PBK, "students must have pursued a broad program of study in the liberal arts and sciences and met other academic criteria as required by the electing chapter."

What does that mean at Columbia?

The Course Bulletin tells us that the distinction goes to the top 10 percent of the senior class, with 2 percent elected in November and the other 8 notified in the spring. This webpage for directors of undergraduate studies makes the distinction between those two groups a little clearer: the first is elected "on the basis of academic achievement (high GPA) and support through faculty recommendations," while the second is elected "on the basis of academic achievement, as determined by GPA and the rigor of a student's academic program, as well as on evidence of intellectual promise, character, and achievements outside the classroom."

The criteria for Phi Beta Kappa election at Barnard are even more vague. All the online course catalog tells us is that "Barnard students of exceptionally high standing are eligible."

Evidently, there's no such thing as a cutoff GPA for Phi Beta Kappa membership. Since some classes have higher grades on average than others, the PBK standards must change every year. Because faculty recommendations play such a big role in the process, Bwog's advice to you is to start buttering up the heads of Columbia and Barnard's PBK chapters as soon as possible: Michael Pippenger and James Hope Runsdorf.

Got a burning question only Bwog can answer? Email us at bwgossip@columbia.edu.


Posted by hmm: [#1] [reply] [track]
( posted February 3, 2008 at 4:57 PM ) (from campus)
or just enjoy your education and make friends with professors who will stimulate you?

oh wait- this is Columbia.
Posted by Ho ho ho: [#2] [reply] [track]
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:11 PM ) (from campus)
you said stimulate! hehehe
Posted by the barn: [#3] [reply] [track]
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:13 PM ) (from campus)
so who's pbk from barnard?
Posted by Speak: [#4] [reply] [track] (in reply to #1)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM ) (from campus)
for yourself.
Posted by hee hee hee: [#5] [reply] [track] (in reply to #3)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:20 PM )
The rough equivalent of whoever would be in the SECOND (or maybe even third) 10% of the class at Columbia.
Posted by barnard girl: [#6] [reply] [track] (in reply to #5)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:33 PM ) (from campus)
right, because we're not all in the same classes or anything
Posted by hahaha: [#7] [reply] [track] (in reply to #6)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:40 PM ) (from campus)
i love that logic. just proves #5's point. Just because you are in the same classes as us doesn't mean that you're top 10% are as good. You guys are being judged against your (relatively mediocre) Barnard peers, therefore there's no reason to believe that you're top 10% match Columbia's.
Posted by Alum: [#8] [reply] [track] (in reply to #2)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:45 PM )
So would you rather be stimulated...or butter up the heads?
Posted by grammarian: [#9] [reply] [track] (in reply to #7)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 5:54 PM ) (from campus)
#7, you, on the other hand, would not fall into the top 10% of either college, as you evidently never managed to grasp the difference between "your" and "you're."
Posted by please: [#10] [reply] [track] (in reply to #8)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 6:01 PM )
tell me you meant that to be as dirty as it came off sounding
Posted by from what i gather: [#11] [reply] [track]
( posted February 3, 2008 at 7:09 PM )
PBK in the spring requires a 4.0+ gpa and amazing faculty recs
Posted by durn: [#12] [reply] [track] (in reply to #11)
( posted February 3, 2008 at 10:20 PM ) (from campus)
a 3.9+ wouldn't suffice?
Posted by asking bwog: [#13] [reply] [track]
( posted February 4, 2008 at 1:06 AM ) (from campus)
bwog i don't know if you've done this already (so sorry for possible deja-vu), but in light of tuesday and etc., could you set up a post where people can RESPECTFULLY discuss their views on presidential candidates at this time? be LEGIT. it extends far beyond a who's who to what we are choosing and what are our choices. what do we care about any longer? and if commenters freak it up even a bit then shame on them cause these are our lives! (complete with all opinions coming through) thanks
Posted by well: [#14] [reply] [track] (in reply to #12)
( posted February 4, 2008 at 1:14 AM )
I think so.

Bwog, can we get a breakdown of major and Rabi Scholars? They're usually heavily represented. Also, I'd imagine the CC Valedictorian and Salutatorian will probably come out of the first round of PBK.
Posted by well well: [#15] [reply] [track]
( posted February 4, 2008 at 2:56 AM )
I don't know how it is at other Universities, but the degree of incessant ranking, competition, and obsession over grades here is absolutely sickening. Due to a combination of circumstances, learning seems to be the most subsidiary concern for so many of us. It's sad.
Posted by could it : [#16] [reply] [track] (in reply to #15)
( posted February 4, 2008 at 10:20 AM ) (from campus)
possibly be the case that there is a strong correlation between how much one learns and what grade one receives?
Posted by FYI: [#17] [reply] [track]
( posted February 4, 2008 at 12:44 PM ) (from campus)
the de facto rule right now is this: to be eligible for consideration for early PBK, you have to have above a 4.0 gpa at the conclusion of junior year. this narrows it down to about 35 students. a committee then meets to discuss and select 20.
Posted by Hey bwog,: [#18] [reply] [track]
( posted February 4, 2008 at 2:52 PM )
Is there a list anywhere of who got PBK last year? I'd be interested.
Posted by hmm...: [#19] [reply] [track] (in reply to #16)
( posted February 4, 2008 at 5:13 PM )
Let me think. Hmmmm.... Yes, there is a correlation. That's not to say that it is determinative, or that it is worthy of our attention to speculate over who might be the valedictorian in any given year.
Posted by never: [#20] [reply] [track]
( posted February 5, 2008 at 6:25 AM ) (from campus)
i wish i was good enough....but i am not not even close....
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine. [ more ]

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Search

Comment Policy

Our Favorite Comments

tbt: [read]
"they will probably lock the trays in the tunnel system with the uranium..."
has to be done...: [read]
"What is this beTRAYal??"

Bwogroll

Commentariat
The Core Junction
Off Broadway
CollegeOTR
Greater or Smaller
The Mayor's Hotel
Barnard Zines
Peter and Rob Make Lists of Things

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom.
This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.
Our interface icons are from the free Silk set.