The Bwog
Rich, Beautiful Girl Finally Gets the Attention She Deserves

beeVanity Fair has released its 68th Annual International Best-Dressed List; the top ten best-dressed women include the very Vogue Bee Shaffer CC'09 (Anna Wintour's daughter, but you knew that). Her company at the top includes Renée Zellweger, Michelle Obama, and, for some reason, Fran Lebowitz.

Congratulations, Bee; we're sure your summer is far more glamorous than ours.


Posted by i wonder: [#1] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 7:06 PM )
do you think there's awkwardness in the house because anna is jealous of bee? think that happens? bet it gets catty...and kinda hottt
Posted by oh yea: [#2] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 7:09 PM )
what's with all these girls and their weird head tilt in all of the photos they take?! has anyone noticed that? i mean most of them are hot (these girls/them being the socialites and the heiresses and etc) but a) a lot of them do have kinda long necks so maybe thats it and b) maybe they all suffer from horrible weird posture?
Posted by Inthaknow: [#3] [reply] [track] (in reply to #2)
( posted August 1, 2007 at 7:28 PM )
They're coached to take that pose in photographs. This is common knowledge.
Posted by ...: [#4] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 8:11 PM )
bwog. new id cards. get on it.

[ external link to www.columbia.edu ]
Posted by hooray!: [#5] [reply] [track] (in reply to #4)
( posted August 1, 2007 at 8:21 PM )
no more ssns on IDs!
Posted by I WANT: [#6] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 8:43 PM )
ONE NOW, LISA HOGARTY! What is this "later in the fall" stuff?
Posted by best dressed?: [#7] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 10:04 PM )
in the public eye, sure. i've totally seen her bumbling around mcbain in sweatpants. granted, they were probably sweatpants that cost more than my entire wardrobe, but sweatpants nonetheless.
Posted by lolz: [#8] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 10:09 PM )
Bumbling... like a bumblebee?
Posted by ummm: [#9] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 11:25 PM )
she's not that hot
Posted by GOB: [#10] [reply] [track]
( posted August 1, 2007 at 11:48 PM )
Bees?!
Posted by i hear: [#11] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 1:36 AM )
she has really cute blue tits.
Posted by greer: [#12] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 6:50 AM )
BEE IS ANOREXIC!
Posted by DHI: [#13] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 10:00 AM )
Glad to see Michelle Obama is getting some recognition - she's a good looking woman.

Barack 1, Bill Clinton 0.
Posted by ughh: [#14] [reply] [track] (in reply to #13)
( posted August 2, 2007 at 10:08 AM )
what the hell does that mean?

Barack and Bill aren't in a contest, and even if they were, why would their wives appearing on a best dressed list up their scores? Just because Hillary doesn't dress as well as Michelle doesn't mean that Bill is "losing" to Barack. I mean, Bill would obviously beat Barack in a moment's notice if he could still run and I'd put my money on Bill in a fight too. Pretty much Bill could own Barack in any way/shape/form/fashion.
Posted by lolololol: [#15] [reply] [track] (in reply to #14)
( posted August 2, 2007 at 10:18 AM )
itz funni becaus he objectifies wymyn!!
Posted by man, bee: [#16] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 10:41 AM )
is so fucking hot
Posted by psh: [#17] [reply] [track] (in reply to #13)
( posted August 2, 2007 at 10:56 AM )
I don't see Barack getting Oval Office head.

Bill Clinton 69, Barack 0
Posted by Ha! Ha!: [#18] [reply] [track] (in reply to #14)
( posted August 2, 2007 at 11:38 AM )
Tell me #14 isn't a militant Barnard feminazi.

And yes, Michelle Obama is much better looking than the manly Hillary.
Posted by Captain Obvious: [#19] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 1:11 PM )
Newsflash: Anyone can be "best-dressed" if they've got the money to buy anything they want.
Posted by DHI: [#20] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 2:37 PM )
The problem with that comment was the tired-ass "x 1, y 0". I fucking hate that phrase, so I don't know why I said that. I still think Michelle Obama's hot, without that hollywood unnatural look.
Posted by CC '09: [#21] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 3:54 PM )
people should stop giving bee shit. She's a really sweet individual who is constantly bashed for having a famous mom.

But on the flipside it's interesting to note that vanity fair is a conde nast publication...
Posted by huh?: [#22] [reply] [track] (in reply to #21)
( posted August 2, 2007 at 4:07 PM )
who gave her shit?

and I assure you if I ever end up bashing her, it'll be for something more substantial than having a famous mom
Posted by rjt: [#23] [reply] [track] (in reply to #20)
( posted August 2, 2007 at 6:25 PM )
I have totally been touting the hotness of Michelle Obama since she was hot at her husband's Senate seat-winning speech.

Also whoever posted that GOB thing, God bless you. Bwog comments usually make me hate humanity, and that one made me laugh.
Posted by y'all bitches: [#24] [reply] [track]
( posted August 2, 2007 at 8:19 PM )
are forgetting Kucinich's wife! babelicious, bro!
Posted by that couldn't be...: [#25] [reply] [track] (in reply to #19)
( posted August 2, 2007 at 10:38 PM )
further from the truth. Some of the worst-dressed celebrities have the most money.
Posted by ouch: [#26] [reply] [track] (in reply to #25)
( posted August 3, 2007 at 12:17 AM )
the lack of logical reasoning hurts. Being rich implies you are capable of being well dressed.

Being rich does not imply you want to be or are well dressed.

Hope you're not intending to pursue any grad school as the exams might be out of your league
Posted by '08: [#27] [reply] [track] (in reply to #26)
( posted August 3, 2007 at 5:11 PM )
hahaha

don't you just love Columbia? we even get pretentious and argumentative about celebrities.
Posted by Captain Obvious: [#28] [reply] [track] (in reply to #26)
( posted August 3, 2007 at 6:11 PM )
...Especially because the standards used to determine "best" are those of a small group of people who are concerned with, and can afford, designers. Therefore, best = that which is exclusive to the rich. Some rich people look like schlubs, but if your only options are Wal-Mart and Target then it's impossible to even compete with the people who are judged best-dressed by other rich people.

LOLZ!
Posted by well.....: [#29] [reply] [track]
( posted August 4, 2007 at 2:46 AM )
There are only two things women should be wearing: aprons and nothing.
Posted by except: [#30] [reply] [track] (in reply to #27)
( posted August 5, 2007 at 8:42 AM )
That Bee isn't really a celebrity...yet. You have to do something like get arrested, act in a B movie, or release a sex tape before you can really consider yourself a celebrity.
Posted by What?: [#31] [reply] [track]
( posted August 5, 2007 at 10:06 PM )
Michelle Obama = hot? What? Is everyone taking crazy pills?
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine. [ more ]

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Search

Comment Policy

Our Favorite Comments

agreed: [read]
"the business school can go only if they host the session in their exclusive library study rooms...."
impossible: [read]
"i believe the chairs will be somehow attached to each other in the auditorium -- so it will be nearly..."

Bwogroll

Commentariat
The Core Junction
Off Broadway
CollegeOTR
Greater or Smaller
The Mayor's Hotel
Barnard Zines
Peter and Rob Make Lists of Things

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom.
This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.
Our interface icons are from the free Silk set.