It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

Columbia can't seem to eighty-six '68

Thai Jones, CU American history Ph.D. candidate and son of Weather Underground founder Jeff Jones, has written a piece in today's New York Times about the University's most recent hunger strike and the history of self-imposed starvation as a means of political activism. Jones compares much of the campus's anti-hunger striking sentiments of just a few months ago with the similar frustrations of 1960s students towards Students for a Democratic Society.

Jones interviews several Columbia students, one postulates that the hunger strike was an argument "that our education has us starving intellectually"—the apparent appetite of the affordable housing-eating octopus non-withstanding. Jones also speaks to his own parents (hi Mom!), who also agree with his favorable comparison of Mark Rudd et al. to 2007's hunger strikers.

Top right photo from NYT via Getty.


Posted by Anonymous : #1 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 6:26 PM
This brings me some minor lulz.
Posted by teehee : #2 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 6:31 PM
His name is Thai.
Posted by XJE : #3 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 6:40 PM
Thai was a TA for History of the City of NY. With Ken Jackson's article about the Flushing remonstrance last week, that's two Times articles from HIST 3535 people within the span of 10 days.
Posted by hah : #4 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 6:57 PM
apparently anyone participating in a weeklong protest at columbia can be assured lasting fame in the pages of nyt and elsewhere for decades to come. ask mark rudd. and now the hunger strike lives on beyond its time as well...
Posted by 1C6T9 : #5 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 7:11 PM
Man, some major SHIT is gonna go down this semester - I can feel it.

It's gonna make the hunger strike + Ahmedinejad distant memories.
Posted by piece : #6 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 7:15 PM
the piece kinda blew. misrepresented much of the strike and didnt really have much of a point
Posted by Honestly, : #7 (in reply to #5) · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 9:19 PM
I hope that you won't have to suffer the ill-effects of diarrhea. But, if you do find yourself with a "major SHIT gonna go down [the toilet]," I recommend some Pepto-Bismol.
Posted by kvetches : #8 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 10:11 PM
"Our education has us starving intellectually?" Bitch bitch bitch moan moan moan. Christ. You know, some things you can learn on your own.
Posted by what do you : #9 · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 11:07 PM
call it when a starving radical activist tries to play baseball?

hunger strike three!
Posted by remember : #10 (in reply to #8) · reply · track
January 6, 2008 at 11:49 PM
it's not "intellectual" for these people if it doesn't misappropriate the word "theory" to deconstruct the presumptions of others in the name of their own presumptions.

see the one "thinker" they mentioned throughout the entirety of their protest - assata shakur, a murderer whose most memorable quote is a paraphrase bordering on plagiarism of comments made by (guess who?) core authors marx and rousseau.
Posted by white male : #11 · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 12:45 AM
i hate it when these uppity minorities challenge my rightly held dominance.
Posted by Anonymous : #12 (in reply to #11) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 1:46 AM
Yeah, those hunger protesters really stuck it to whitey.

What with abandoning the residents of Harlem when it came to expansion.

Giving white folks even more knowledge is the best way to uplift minorities.
Posted by Yeah, : #13 (in reply to #12) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 3:58 AM
obviously it's the hunger strikers' fault now that the City and Columbia is moving forward with the expansion.

Man, they didn't do anything to stop Columbia's expansion plans! They shoulda taken a cue from us and just on their asses while Columbia bulldozes Harlem.

And they educated so many white folks! Because everybody knows only white people go to Columbia! They didn't reach out to any minorities at all!
Posted by So last semester : #14 · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 8:52 AM
I hope the hunger strikers went abroad.
Posted by Soon : #15 (in reply to #14) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 10:49 AM
Mercer, gone. Karina and Judd - almost gone. Also, Kulawik will leave too. My senior year might actually be a peaceful one.
Posted by haha : #16 (in reply to #15) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 12:15 PM
unlikely. for every one that leaves ten more come, dazzled by the continued media reply (see above) and glamorization of '68.
Posted by oops : #17 (in reply to #16) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 12:15 PM
should read "media replay"
Posted by Anonymous : #18 (in reply to #13) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 1:49 PM
Um...they stopped hunger striking and the plan is going forward exactly the same? I don't really understand how they did anything at all when it came to actually helping a minority group. Most of their benefits will be granted to upper class white people, since that is the plurality of people who attend Columbia.

Thus, you are wrong on every count.
Posted by meh : #19 (in reply to #18) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM
They think that by having more white people learn about ethnic studies, white people will be less likely to commit hate crimes and otherwise oppress minorities, so the minorities will benefit from the reduction in the probability that they will fall victim to a hate crime.
Posted by tear :'( : #20 (in reply to #15) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 7:22 PM
I am so sad that Kulawik is graduating.
Posted by uh... : #21 · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 8:21 PM
why so much animosity towards white people? we're not all racists or upper class.
Posted by You're right : #22 (in reply to #18) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 8:25 PM
It's their fault that they didn't sacrifice more for expansion, even though all of the strikers were involved in anti-expansion activities. They should have blown up the City Council building or something to stop Columbia. Or they should have just sat on their asses like you because overturning the plan is futile anyways.

No you're wrong, commenter 18. Ignorance. If you think the strikers were okay with the status quo, and if you think "the plan [was] going forward exactly the same", then you're mistaken, and you don't know anything about what happened afterwards and the efforts to stop Columbia's expansion.

Why do you people insist that it's the strikers' fault that Columbia's expansion plan was allowed to proceed?
Posted by Anonymous : #23 (in reply to #22) · reply · track
January 7, 2008 at 9:54 PM
Um...because they stopped striking when they got everything except their expansion demands met?
Posted by Faulty logic : #24 · reply · track
January 8, 2008 at 6:42 AM
You try to stop eating for days you fucking douchebag and see if you can go on forever. To continue on til the Council vote would have meant not eating for weeks. And again, if you can't get it through your head - the end of the strike was by no means the end of the anti-expansion campaign. So instead of complaining about how the strikers did nothing why don't you take a minute and think about how much you did to stop Columbia from taking over Harlem. If you were involved in SCEG or some community organization at some point, then I commend you. If you weren't, well then stop your whining asshole.
Posted by umm : #25 · reply · track
January 8, 2008 at 2:23 PM
All that article succeeded in doing was convincing me never to take a class with Thai Jones. The man clearly can't write.

Also, what should the Barnard girl care about the Core's supposed intellectual starvation??

Get off ma stoop, BC.
Posted by HA! : #26 · reply · track
January 8, 2008 at 2:43 PM
If you weren't willing to starve to death, then your little pissant "strike" meant nothing more than a scare-and-tear-mongering attention grab. I can't believe that references to Gandhi and those Irish guys (who did starve to death) were even raised.
Posted by Anonymous : #27 (in reply to #24) · reply · track
January 8, 2008 at 4:39 PM
So you admit the strike wasn't actually serious?

That was a stupid thing to write in public.
Posted by The references : #28 · reply · track
January 9, 2008 at 1:02 AM
to Gandhi and Irish prisoners were made by people outside of the strike campaign, specifically that Bwog/ Spectator columnist.

And commenter 27, piss off and stop inferring shit. Sympathizing with the strikers by defending their decisions not to starve themselves for two or three more weeks does not mitigate the seriousness of the strike. Again for your faulty conclusions, Anonymous. Goes for you too #26. Why don't you make a sacrifice as daring as the strikers did - I doubt you'd be willing to starve a day to protest the expansion.

I'm out. I've had enough of you whining assholes. Jealous much? Stop assuming that the strikers possessed only the most self-interested of intentions; why don't you start looking at their records and pay attention to the activities that will never make it onto their resumes. Yeah, I don't think you'd even compare.
Posted by Poster 26 : #29 (in reply to #28) · reply · track
January 9, 2008 at 5:25 AM
No, I won't be willing to "starve" (which only starts after 3-4 days, biologically speaking) for a day to protest the expansion. Why?

BECAUSE I SUPPORT THE EXPANSION.

Let's take the reverse. If the expansion were cancelled, would I be willing to "starve" myself for a day to protest that? No. Why?

BECAUSE IT WOULDN'T CHANGE ANYTHING.

Get it into your little whiny head. You accomplished nothing but draw attention to yourself and besmirch the name of this university and by extension the reputation of the overwhelming majority of students who don't sympathize with your objectives AND don't respect you for having the "courage" (aka arrogance) to make a "stand for your beliefs" (aka poorly executed public theatrics).
Posted by Anonymous : #30 (in reply to #28) · reply · track
January 10, 2008 at 12:31 PM
I don't even support expansion, and I generally agreed with the strikers about their points of contention. But I think their lack of serious regard when it came to expansion certainly makes it appear as though they were not serious and also did not care about Harlem as much they cared about Campus glory.

I'm not saying it was easy, but I'm saying they had Columbia on the ropes. They gave up, selling out Harlem, and showing their true colors. Thus I think my criticism is valuable and true.
Posted by negotiator : #31 · reply · track
January 10, 2008 at 10:19 PM
while I am sure you mean well, I'm afraid this is a serious misreading of the situation. As one of the negotiators who focused on the expansion, it was clear that Columbia was going to wait us out indefinitely, instead of giving us even minor concessions.

There were two different sets of negotiations - one with Quigley/Dirks on academic issues and one with Maxine Griffith on expansion. The tenor of these were utterly different - Quigley and Dirks definitely sympathized with the goals of the strike and were willing to work with us whereas the expansion people treated every meeting as an information session about the merits of Columbia's plan and how it is going to save Harlem from itself.

As such, we weren't about to sacrifice the health of our friends in such a manner. You should know that the majority of the strikers are SCEG members and are continuing to work with the opposition community groups as actively as before.

And as has been repeated ad nauseum *the strike did not attempt to stop the expansion, it attempted to push the university to change it to be more accountable to community needs in a compromise solution*...
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
37 °F, Wintry Mix

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.