It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

Down They Go

The hunger strike is over, and contrary to what we we were told last night, so is the camp-out. Hunger-strikers and volunteers are currently taking down the tents, dismantling the Columbopus's remaining tentacles, and otherwise preparing to permanently vacate Butler Plaza.

Hunger striker Richard Brown, C '10 cited a "need to clean up" as one of the reasons for ending the nearly two-week encampment. "We can't have these out here forever," he said. "The tents have served their purpose."

While the tents were a pretty obvious presence on campus, less obvious was what the strikers were keeping inside of them: Bwog spotted about a dozen blankets, a few portable radios, musical instruments, and a cardboard box full of books, including Breakfast of Champions by Kurt Vonnegut, a Penguin collection of English romantic verse, a long essay by Noam Chomsky (with the ever so Chomskyan title of "The Prosperous Few and the Restless Many"), the 33 1/3 for Neutral Milk Hotel's In The Aeroplane Over the Sea, and an anthology of poetry read at the Nuyorican Poets Cafe.

If this was a bittersweet moment for the strikers, none of them were showing it. "The hunger strike is over, but the struggle continues" said striker April Simpson, C'11. Even though the strikers are abandoning their temporary home and base of operations, and potentially (severely) diminishing their visibility on campus, this is about as sentimental as things have gotten out there. Right now, they're pretty much just cleaning up.

-ARR


Posted by LOLmarx : #1 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 3:35 PM
so does this count as a victory for the bourgeois?
Posted by 2 things : #2 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 3:55 PM
first rich brown is awesome -- i have a ton of respect for you my friend, in this endeavor and all other things.

second, i'm going to miss seeing the tents up on the lawn. they were a nice symbol of humanity when i'd come out of butler at 5am, and confront an otherwise desolate campus.
Posted by anonymous : #3 (in reply to #1) · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 4:06 PM
The bourgeois always win. We're smarter - that's why we're the bourgeois.
Posted by about time : #4 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 4:07 PM
those tents were an eyesore... I'm glad they're gone. and I'm glad the self-important strikers are going with them.
Posted by i think : #5 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 4:16 PM
the waiting list to block that spot on the lawn for hunger strikes will be like 2 years long...haha
Posted by Strikers : #6 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 4:28 PM
You have accomplished nothing.
Posted by anonymous : #7 (in reply to #5) · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 5:15 PM
Hey, I said that on another Bwog post.

Don't they teach you citations in intro writing? :P
Posted by Congratulations : #8 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 5:31 PM
You've earned so much disrespect and disrepute on campus.

I have no doubt that your self-importance and obsession with oppression, rather than creation, will make you miserable in life.

Keep fighting.
Posted by Fo realz : #9 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 5:41 PM
If you did accomplish something substantial, counter-strikers might still respect you, but this is pure shame.
Posted by hmm.. : #10 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 6:04 PM
pretty sure that's April Simpson, not Emily Simpson...
Posted by respect : #11 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 6:05 PM
Since we're on the topic of respect, I have one suggestion for future strikers or protesters of any sort:

Make sure your leadership does not stoop to the level of making public and misguided, intolerant insults. Let me start by saying that i support at least some of the strike's demands (the ones regarding expansion with respect and a need for better response to hate crimes). Some of the biggest factors that turned me off about this particular strike, however, were the very public and very immature, self-aggrandizing comments made by a number of the hunger strikers (not all, but at least some). I won't mention them by name but I think a fair number of you who have been tracking the strike will know exactly who has been making ignorant, polarizing and hate-mongering comments.

I understand that many cruel things have also been said about the strikers, and that (as I noticed someone said in an earlier post yesterday) they have been "provoked". I'm truly sorry and appalled that they have had to deal with irrational, spiteful and unjustified comments. However, I feel that as the most public faces and representatives of the strike, and thereby an example for their supporters, they also have the responsibility NOT to lower themselves to the level of people throwing food at the tents, or anonymous commenters saying mean things online. Making dumb statements right back, or publicly belittling opponents in a mocking, derogatory way, does NOTHING to advance your cause. Instead, it only leads to more hatred and more misunderstanding. It lessens your credibility as a campus leader, and also the credibility of your project in the eyes of the student body.

If you choose to take such a public stance on very controversial issues, you should expect criticism, in both valid and invalid forms. What is important, however, is to keep your cool and set a good example, rather than being arrogant and condescending. If you do not think you maintain a cool front in public even in the face of opposition, do your cause a favor and do not volunteer yourself as a leader. Cede the spotlight to someone who can represent the cause well. After all, if you are going to adopt the tactics of Gandhi and MLK Jr, you might as well adopt the grace and dignity that they also embodied in public.
Posted by They'll be back : #12 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 6:23 PM
Next month or next year wanting to rename Hamilton after a cop killer or Butler after Malcolm X. And we'll be here to tell them to get fucked. This incident has exposed a rift in the student body that has existed for a long time. Activists: time to revise your lazy arguments supported by ad hominem attacks. No one gives a shit if you call them a racist anymore. Your big gun has been silenced and your shit will not be tolerated anymore.
Posted by Rename SIPA : #13 (in reply to #12) · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 6:37 PM
I'm all for renaming SIPA. "The Mike Tyson School of Diplomacy" just works better.
Posted by invisible_hand : #14 (in reply to #12) · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 7:28 PM
what, oh Lord, is the purpose of higher, or any, education, if it does not teach us to be civil and compassionate human beings. you, #12, make me ashamed to be a columbian. and before you say that that's what the strikers did to you, at least they never stooped to your level of hateful bile.
Posted by ho ho ho : #15 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 7:41 PM
I see you've commandeered the high ground. Ooooohhh. I should have added to my original post that no one cares if you switch into prudish disapproval mode, either. Your disapproval is entirely predictable and equally irrelevant.
Posted by I have never : #16 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 7:56 PM
seen as much hatred on campus as the strikers have caused and instigated.
Posted by why is that title : #17 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 8:49 PM
particularly chomskyan?

Posted by Sigh : #18 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 8:58 PM
[external link to www.facebook.com]

Talk about flogging a dead horse. On the plus side, a day-long silent protest will give the rest of us a nice break from their self-righteous bullshit.
Posted by hmmm : #19 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 9:13 PM
You know what would be funny...... If all major culture seminars in 25 years will be taught in the mville campus
Posted by ok... : #20 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 9:40 PM
Hillarious.
Posted by have you seen : #21 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 10:48 PM
el participante?

elparticipante.blogspot.com
Posted by hahahahaha : #22 (in reply to #19) · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 11:07 PM
i love it!!
Posted by hooray : #23 · reply · track
November 17, 2007 at 11:46 PM
I'm glad that so much good came out of this whole striker thing. I'm pleased with the outcome and glad that justice prevailed in face of evil. Yo we should turn the candlelight vigils into some sort of a campus organization because man those things were AWESOME
Posted by what? : #24 (in reply to #23) · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 12:43 AM
are you on some kind of drugs?

did you forget, frances, that you already let the bwog know that you were this e-mail address?

and that you said this: "The most important thing about this is that no side can claim to be 'right' because neither side will ever agree..."

so if someone disagrees with the methods of the strike, are they "evil" now?

you've got to calm down and think rationally about this, or no one is going to take the demands seriously, ever, and everyone will be bitter and/or miserable.
Posted by i love the way : #25 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 1:10 AM
frances jeffrey coker keeps on exposing herself on bwog unintentionally. It's really funny, confirming both her low tactics and also her lack of foresight.

totally agree with #24 above. One of the biggest, perhaps THE biggest, grievance people have had with the strike is the way people who don't support it are called "evil," as frances just did, even when they have legitimate reasons for doing so.

i though frances jeffrey coker had acknowledged this yesterday, and me being naive, i hoped she would stop this polarizing, inflammatory rhetoric. But no. She is determined to see it as good versus evil.

frances, if you read this, please acknowledge over a great many students do not see how "so much good came out this whole striker thing," cease taking the moral highground, admit serious mistakes were made, and above all, stop calling the people who don't support you "evil" when they have very real and as yet unanswered concerns with this whole pitiful saga. You were making good progress on this front yesterday, please try regain that ground and move the debate forward sensibly. If you want to do something constructive, please respond to the questions sent to you numerous most times, most recently in that open letter from Chas Carey et al. posted here: [external link to www.bwog.net]

if you don't do that, may i suggest you stop posting? It's unfortunate for the hunger strikers (many of whom are not as emotive or as quick to attack as you) that the more you open your mouth, the more you give people reason to oppose the strike.
Posted by as a thought... : #26 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 12:16 PM
all they accomplished was killing some grass in front of butler.
Posted by non-hypocrite : #27 (in reply to #25) · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 2:11 PM
at least she exposes herself, unlike you, coward!!!!!!!
Posted by the coward : #28 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 4:30 PM
This is really petty, but I'm bored. So... I'm the hypocrite? Sure, mr./ms. "non-hypocrite." Now which one of us asked someone to expose his/herself but wouldn't do it ourself? (Which makes wonder if you know what the meaning of hypocrisy is. In case not, it can be found here: [external link to www.answers.com]

For my part, I merely laughed at the way frances jeffrey coker made such a fool of herself in public.

And I have good reasons for not exposing myself. Thanks to the terribly tense environment on campus now that has been so efficiently cultivated by this failed hunger strike, I fear that unwarranted ( [external link to www.answers.com] ad hominem ( [external link to www.answers.com] attacks will proliferate ( [external link to www.answers.com] against me.

Hope you are able to understand this, frances (it is you, right? - judging by your shallow insults and hilarious inability to make sense.)

Posted by haha : #29 (in reply to #27) · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 4:33 PM
it's ironic that you call #25 a coward for not posting his/her name, when you call yourself a "non-hypocrite" instead of posting YOUR own name.
Posted by non-hypocrite : #30 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 4:48 PM
wow did you people not realize that the irony was intentional?? WOW guys did you ever consider getting a sense of humor and not taking ANONYMOUS BLOG COMMENTS so SERIOUSLY? i mean, #28 is actually afraid of being "attacked"! HA HA HA!!!

go outside, geeks.
Posted by Frances JeffreyCoker : #31 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 4:55 PM
To #28.. no, actually, that wasn't me. Maybe it was one of my friends though. Who knows.

Whoops I didn't know you could track that. I've never used bwog before this whole striker thing. Oh well.

I don't really understand how I made a fool of myself, but if thats the case, oh well again. I'd rather be an honest fool than an anonymous fool.

Has anyone ever taken the skiing PE elective? I need advice.
Posted by it gets better : #32 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 5:03 PM
It was very deeply ironic, frances, but if it was intentional, what exactly were you intending to achieve? Have you asked that question yet, or were you just desperately coming up with an excuse after that embarrassing post earlier (#27)?

The only thing your irony achieved was to make you look like a fool. But maybe you can explain?

thanks, i love it when you keep showing your intellectual brilliance on bwog.

Posted by Frances JeffreyCoker : #33 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 6:05 PM
What was ironic? No really, I didn't put that post, #27. I don't know who put it. I didn't post anything in irony either... maybe if it had been ironic then I would look less of a fool?? I don't know. But nothing I said was meant to be ironic.

The only posts on this wall I'm responsible for are #23 and #31. Okay so #23 was obnoxious. If it really bothers you, then I retract it.
Posted by non-hypocrite : #34 (in reply to #32) · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 6:35 PM
lol use the tracking function, dipshit, or just read the comment before yours to see i am not the same person as "Frances". hahaha

what was i trying to acheive? what makes you think i'm trying to acheive anything? do i need to say it again? ITS ANONYMOUS POSTING ON AN INTERNET BLOG! its hilarious how seriously you take this shit. hahahahahahahaha!!!
Posted by my bad : #35 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 6:46 PM
alright frances, please accept my apologies. I suspect I may have overkilled on my personal attack against you, and that wasn't cool.

good luck with the PE skiing class, and let's everyone be friends now and stop obsessing with bwog! ;)

i'm done with this hunger strike and not coming back to this discussion again, so peace to everyone and let's get on with our lives.
Posted by Frances JeffreyCoker : #36 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 6:51 PM
Haha, fer real. Thanks!
Posted by RESCUE : #37 (in reply to #11) · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 7:11 PM
you're a racist.
Posted by what's : #38 · reply · track
November 18, 2007 at 8:07 PM
a racist?
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
36 °F, Cloudy

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: info@eastasiareview.org

The Columbia East Asia Review is currently accepting submissions for its 2009 edition. Research papers from all disciplines and majors are welcome. For more information and submission details, please visit us at www.eastasiareview.org

or e-mail us at info@eastasiareview.org. The deadline for submissions is January 24, 2009.
East Asia Review Website


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.