It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

Embedded with the Dems: Day 1

Bwog editor Lydia DePillis hitched a ride with the Columbia Democrats this weekend on their annual fall campaign trip. Over the next few days, she'll be filing dispatches from the trail, wireless permitting.

kentuckyLEXINGTON, Ky.--I'm not sure why I woke up at 5:40 AM this morning, evidently without my alarm.

I catapulted out of bed, swearing loudly, glad that my roommate wasn't there to be rudely rousted from slumber. I was late for a road trip to help oust a governor.

Still cursing, I threw my electronic implements and their assorted chargers in my half-packed bags and shuffled over to College Walk, where four vans sat idling, full of 43 Democrats munching bagels. They had gathered to spend their election day weekend as Columbia's historical mandarins had intended: pleading with apathetic Americans to vote Democrat.

I doubt that those who switched fall break from Columbus Day to early November considered political off years. There are almost no competitive elections around the country, and the one the Dems picked—the Kentucky gubernatorial race—is as uncompetitive as they come when both candidates have a pulse. Ernie Fletcher, the state's first Republican governor in 30 years, has been charged with conspiracy, official misconduct, and political discrimination for one of the most blatant patronage schemes since the heyday of machine politics. His Democratic opponent, Steve Beshear, could be your grandma's fruitcake and still lead the polls by 23 points.

But a campaign without the specter of defeat—like last year's trip to Ohio for Sherrod Brown, or the massive mobilization for election 2004—can still be exciting. Kentucky isn't solidly in either column for 2008, and the Columbia squadron will be shoring up support for whatever Democratic candidate ends up coming through with the nomination. Meanwhile, it's a free trip to Kentucky—the Beshear campaign is paying for lodging in Lexington, the student councils and governing boards kicked in a few grand for transport, and the Dems covered the rest with their ample and undisclosed (if this year reduced) club allocation.

Over the next four days, I'll be tagging along with the young activists as they canvass the state for undecideds. Having never been south of the Mason-Dixon line before--besides Washington, DC, which doesn't really count--I have pretty much no idea what to expect. Fast horses? Abe Lincoln? Waffles and chicken? Stay tuned!


Posted by coogan : #1 · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 7:42 PM
"But a campaign without the specter of defeat—like last year's trip to Ohio for Sherrod Brown, or the massive mobilization for election 2004—can still be exciting"

Not sure what this means, LBD. I went to the "massive mobilization in 2004" and there most definitely was an awful specter of defeat. After the trip, I cried for a solid two days. A new personal best.

Better than having a bleeding heart.
Posted by kentuckian : #2 · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 8:14 PM
ever since I heard they were going to Kentucky, I thought it was dumb -- Ernie Fletcher has never had a chance regardless of who wound up being the Democratic candidate. But the alternate goal that they'll "shore up support" is also kind of silly. Depending on where they go, people could be more annoyed at elite big-city people acting like they know best. (Part of why Anne Northup didn't do so hot in the primary, even against a d-bag like Fletcher.)
Posted by lol cat : #3 · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 9:38 PM
the columbia dems are some righteous motherfuckers! (wait, where are they whenever students try to organize on campus?)
Posted by also : #4 · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 10:10 PM
spec has coverage:

[external link to www.columbiaspectator.com]
Posted by Umm : #5 · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 10:57 PM
Are political groups allowed to fully pay for their travel expenses with Columbia funding?

Because last I checked all ABC groups (i.e., everyone else) can only pay for 50% of the costs with their allocation (sucks if you're a competitive group that travels). One of the most fucked up bass ackwards rules ever promulgated at this school.
Posted by seriously! : #6 (in reply to #3) · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 11:01 PM
what higher political calling could possibly exist than whatever columbia students have their panties in a bunch about? GIVE ME JOHN JAY TAKEOUT BOXES OR GIVE ME DEATH!
Posted by kentucky : #7 · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 11:31 PM
great state, or greatest state?
Posted by Virginian : #8 · reply · track
November 2, 2007 at 11:56 PM
Never been South of the Mason-Dixon before? Jeez, what is wrong with you people? No wonder elite, big-city liberals don't get the rest of the country. They clearly haven't been there and don't know the culture. It's more than guns and God and lard-based foods, ya know. Sometimes I'm surprised at how naive so many smart people can be.
Posted by coogan : #9 · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 12:00 AM
As a native of Lynchburg, Virginia, I must say:

If you are in the north, you're not from the south.

For our cyberworld: If you post on Bwog, you're not from the south
Posted by Martian : #10 · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 12:20 AM
As a native of Mars, Mars, I must say:

If you are on Earth, you're not from Mars.
Posted by i think : #11 (in reply to #1) · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 1:11 AM
she means a campaign where you can actually lose (as in the 04 election and the brown election were competitive--suggesting a correlation with how exciting itd be) doesn't necessarily imply it won't be interesting

Either way, even though i usually dislike politics on this blog i like this trip and the blogging so far. And even though i'm a repub, Fletcher is a major league douchebag who deserves to be thrown out.

you cried for two days? sack up ninny
Posted by never been south : #12 · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 3:25 AM
of the mason dixon line? i find that hard to believe, lydia. have you been to washington, dc or maryland ever?
Posted by Sprinkles : #13 · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 7:43 AM
I can't help but think that trips like these are kind of...patronizing.

Or just really, really patronizing.

I'm sure plenty of people in Kentucky resent a bunch of New Yorkers coming down and acting like they know who Kentuckians should vote for. Telling people they never met what they should do, when we have plenty of problems in New York we still haven't addressed. Catch my drift?
Posted by Um... : #14 (in reply to #12) · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 11:27 AM
If you actually kept reading past the phrase “Mason-Dixon line”, you would’ve seen the rest of the sentence, which looked like this:

“Having never been south of the Mason-Dixon line before--besides Washington, DC, which doesn't really count--I have pretty much no idea what to expect.”
Posted by celeste : #15 (in reply to #13) · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 11:39 AM
In defense of the Dems, they DON'T run the campaign and they aren't being patronizing. Dems try to pick race that is close, both in the polls and in driving distance. Because the campaign is picked a few months before the actual trip so that some actual planning can be going on, of course the numbers can change. The work that the Dems do for campaigns is invaluable to and much appreciated by the campaign they work for. It is not as though the Dems are running the campaign; rather, we're knocking on doors, phone banking, getting materials together, etc. Never does the group completely step in to run the campaign. I you know something about the setup of the trip before criticizing it.
Posted by cougar : #16 (in reply to #14) · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 1:27 PM
I agree with celeste; I find it just as patronizing for certain people posting to say the Dems are being patronizing for going to the South when they have not seen it for themselves. The Dems work within the campaign going on; they don't come down with their own goals and plans on how to make Kentucky more like New York.

Should people from certain cities never go to other parts of the country for fear of being patronizing? Ridiculous.
Posted by no, : #17 · reply · track
November 3, 2007 at 10:03 PM
but when they do go, they should refrain from making ignorant statements about the area they're campaigning in, familiarize themselves about the issues that are important to the people there (granted, some of them may have and it's not being reported here), and perhaps consider that resources would be better spent in a race that wasn't a gimmee.
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
36 °F, Fair

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.