It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

ESC, etc.: Meet Your New CourseWorks, CULPA

Fu Foundation Bureau Chief Sean Zimmermann attended tonight's ESC meeting. Exciting changes to your Internet are afoot!

The ESC meeting this week was dominated by two website presentations. CUIT previewed the "Next Gen CourseWorks" named Sakai, while two sophomores previewed their new website ColumbiaClasses.com, which aims to be a replacement for CULPA and Columbia's own course information pages.

Bwog was particularly impressed with Sakai, the arrival of which has been in the works since May. The site looks easier to navigate than CourseWorks and fixes some of the more archaic parts of CourseWorks system, for example file management. Here are some of the key features:

  • Over 100 other schools use Sakai, including Yale, Hopkins, Stanford, and MIT.
  • Has large focus on collaboration (wikis, blogs, podcasts, calendars, document sharing)
  • Will integrate well with existing systems, and can be customized for Columbia.
  • Could be deployed as early as Fall '09. There will be a time when some courses are on Sakai and others on CourseWorks, but CUIT said it would be "as seamless as possible."
  • CUIT is currently trying to raise support throughout the university and is asking for student representatives to sit on an Advisory Committee to oversee the deployment of the new system.
  • Biggest Improvements:
    • Individuals get their own personalized area (called "My Workspace") where students have their own calendar that has info from all classes, and can sync with Palm/iPhone/Blackberry/Computer.
    • New File Management System (can add links, text documents, etc), directly from the webpage. Can also create citation lists and search for articles using Google Scholar directly through Sakai.
    • Groups can request Sakai sites (like courses) so their members can collaborates.

ColumbiaClasses aims to create an officially sanctioned website that has all the information of the College Bulletin, but also allows student to rate and review professors.

Bwog liked the system; it had some very interesting features, for instance, it could recommend courses based on ones you have already taken and enjoyed. However, in order for the system to be sanctioned by the University, it must be moderated. Users must sign-in to the system to see or post information. Though ratings and signed reviews (where the reviewer leaves his username public) are un-moderated, anonymous reviews are subject to moderator approval, and can be rejected. Users can also anonymously add their grade, so the site can show an average grade for the course (assuming enough people post).

  • Required login makes it so only members of the community are the only ones that can view data, so the school doesn't have to worry about posting official information being posted (subject to approval), some teachers' official university evaluations will be available on their rating page).
  • Feedback network between students, professors, and administration.
  • Replace CULPA
    • Create more valid data set
    • Rating breakdown
    • Average grade feature
  • Augment University's Current System
    • Class Recommendations
    • Browse for classes by subject, school, or department
  • Used book trading system (shows asking price from seller, plus price comparisons from Amazon)
    • Site does not take commission.

Posted by culpa fan : #1 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 12:42 AM
I think the idea of an "officially sanctioned" evaluation system completely negates the very purpose of Culpa. Keep it as it is. I very much doubt that the proposed new system would equal it.
Posted by CCSC : #2 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 12:47 AM (from campus)
Way to drop the ball Bwog, this was presented last night at the CCSC meeting, the engineers got sloppy seconds.
Posted by yeah but : #3 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 12:55 AM (from campus)
ccsc LOL look who's talking
Posted by Culpa fan #2 : #4 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 12:59 AM (from campus)
Yeah I think a school-run Culpa-clone would be a disaster. LEAVE AS IS.
Posted by however : #5 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:03 AM (from campus)
I'm quite happy at the prospect of a CourseWorks replacement. The current one functions like vintage 1990.
Posted by FYI... : #6 (in reply to #2) · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:04 AM
Members of ESC worked with CUIT and CU Libraries last year to be educated on Sakai.

So, CCSC instead got sloppy seconds?
Posted by lol : #7 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:07 AM (from campus)
Gotta love ccsc-esc dick-wagging.
Posted by CULPA : #8 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:12 AM (from campus)
Does Columbia Courses have anything to do with the update to CULPA the CULPA team posted in late July? If not, that's a pretty rude move by the CC devs. Will the reviews from CULPA at least be transferred to CC (why lose them all)?

Also, why do we get another thing with the acronym "CC?" We have enough of them already.
Posted by culpa sucks : #9 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:12 AM (from campus)
They don't post any new reviews. Professors change so much that the information is not relevant. Good idea, poor execution.
Posted by wow : #10 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:13 AM
Sakai was introduced way the fuck back in 2005.

[external link to www.columbiaspectator.com]
Posted by sloppy seconds, : #11 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:24 AM (from campus)
my ass! Columbia Classes has been in alpha for weeks
Posted by really... : #12 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:25 AM (from campus)
it's just a matter of scheduling.

CCSC's meetings happen on Sunday nights and ESC's on Monday nights...
Posted by Nope : #13 (in reply to #9) · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:27 AM (from campus)
I've seen reviews there as recently as August 2008. Culpa is still the God of all.
Posted by Yeah : #14 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:31 AM (from campus)
CULPA still updates - you can see reviews. I think the problem is that people need to review more. I, for one, have never submitted a CULPA review.

Also, in response to #8, why would CULPA reviews move to CC? Unless CC and CULPA are the same, which I doubt...
Posted by Ryan Bubinski : #15 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:51 AM (from campus)
As the founder of ColumbiaClasses, I feel I need to clarify a few points:

-ColumbiaClasses is NOT administered by the University, nor is it "school-run." It is an independent project launched and moderated by two sophomores in the College.

-ColumbiaClasses is a not-for-profit venture. We simply seek to satisfy a need for a more comprehensive course and instructor evaluation system.

-ColumbiaClasses has been in alpha testing since Monday of last week (7 days does not constitute "weeks"), and will launch on November 15 to the entire undergraduate community.

-CULPA and ColumbiaClasses are not currently collaborating in any way.

-To reiterate, ColumbiaClasses is RUN by students FOR students. We aim to include user submitted evaluations as well as the official University evaluations that have been collected over the past years via CourseWorks as well as an expansive toolset that takes full advantage of this data set.

For more information visit [external link to columbiaclasses.com]

Any questions should be directed to contact@columbiaclasses.com

Thank you,

Ryan Bubinski,

ColumbiaClasses Founder
Posted by Maybe? : #16 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:52 AM (from campus)
It's not the same people as CULPA - they graduated years ago I think.

I dunno... if these new guys do it well I'll use it for the average grade thing.
Posted by wait a sec : #17 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:52 AM
how can this columbiaclasses.com website, which isn't affiliated with the university, use unis for login. how does that work?
Posted by Ryan Bubinski : #18 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:57 AM (from campus)
[external link to www.columbia.edu]
Posted by Interesting : #19 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:57 AM (from campus)
I wonder if the idea for ColumbiaClasses came about as a result of CULPA's 'letter' about the subject this summer. The CC devs say they've been working on the project over the fall, which would imply that the CC devs had at least read the letter. Oh, I smell controversy ahead!
Posted by it's called : #20 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 1:59 AM (from campus)
an API
Posted by How can : #21 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 2:00 AM (from campus)
Columbia Classes use the course evaluations collected by columbia? Wouldn't that entail having a *special* relationship with the university?
Posted by too late? : #22 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 2:23 AM (from campus)
is it too late for Columbia Classes to change their name? having "CC" as the abbreviation will get really annoying, and no one wants to type out "Columbia Classes" every time. this is why CULPA was amazing.
Posted by yay : #23 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 2:44 AM (from campus)
now we can read about CC and other CC classes on CC.
Posted by hmm : #24 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 3:40 AM (from campus)
Mr. Bubinski, you assert that Culpa and CC are not currently working together. Well, why not? It seems silly to not share information and have them split between two website. This doubles the time students spend looking for a professor's reviews.
Posted by anonymous : #25 (in reply to #24) · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 5:16 AM
A merger!!!

Call in the unemployed bankers quick!
Posted by Former CU Employee : #26 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 8:56 AM
I nearly spat my reeses puffs on the monitor reading this. Those course evaluations are written in confidence and for inter(not even intra)departmental use. Has the university even begun to agree to this? I think you have a long, vertical road to travel before they even think about turning those things over.
Posted by omfgharrypotter : #27 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 9:44 AM (from campus)
[external link to gawker.com]

She's heeeeerey
Posted by from site : #28 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 10:29 AM (from campus)
They're in bed with spec and CUIT: The development team greatly appreciates the assistance Columbia Spectator and CUIT have provided in making the course and instructor information contained within the site available to the Columbia student body.
Posted by the real evals : #29 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 10:37 AM (from campus)
are guarded by the schools. cuit will not release them without the authorization of the schools. SEAS already publicly publishes numerical results ( [external link to oracle.seas.columbia.edu] and has been doing so since ~2001? The comments remain confidential to the professor, department, and dean's office.

Unlikely that they will be able to get these comments.

Also - notice what happens when you log in with WIND. They do not receive your UNI as a token. Instead, they receive an anonymous identifier thats purpose is solely to identify you as having a valid UNI (and possibly as being a student). THEN they ASK YOU AGAIN for your UNI. DO NOT GIVE YOUR REAL UNI THE SECOND TIME AND THEY CAN NEVER KNOW.
Posted by proposal : #30 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 11:58 AM (from campus)
Columbia students love launching web projects that work for a few years and then fall apart because there is no stewardship. CULPA is one of the few that's lasted, but barely.

Campus Playbook is a great idea. So was WikiCU, Carsplit.com, etc.

Columbia needs a grassroots student development team that passes these things on from one class to the next so that students aren't reinventing the wheel every 2 years. Dartmouth has such an organization the developed its own internal online facebook in the late 90s (LionLink launched in what, 2006?), its own email program (cubmail still sucks), runs online elections, and runs an internal exchange (is anyone old enough to remember dogears.net?).
Posted by ... : #31 (in reply to #29) · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 12:09 PM (from campus)
poppycock. the single sign-on system most certainly does pass on the uni of the authenticated user.

there's nothing anonymous about it.
Posted by ??? : #32 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 12:12 PM (from campus)
[external link to developers.columbiaspectator.com]
Posted by ahaha : #33 (in reply to #32) · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 12:21 PM (from campus)
thats hilarious. Spec is one of the worst platforms from which to launch student web development. they have on of the shittiest newspaper websites available. their archives are 5 years old - tops, and many older articles are cut off partway through. And the search system blows.

Compare to the Crimson, Daily Pennsylvanian, and Daily Princetonian websites. It's not even close.

Put your own house in order first.
Posted by Tom : #34 · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 3:12 PM (from campus)
Hi - Tom from Spec here. Will draft a more detailed response at some point regarding this, but just wanted to say for now that Spec is not "in bed" with columbiaclasses. The site grew out of an original Spectator initiative and the paper played a role in helping it get started, which I think is great, but Spec will not be moderating the site. The founders (who worked their asses off to build an excellent site, for free) are running the show. Spec is involved in the sense that we are interested in nurturing, in any humble way we can, web initiatives by students - currently an under-appreciated/developed talent base on our campus. This also helps Spectator wrestle with new technologies and try to harness the many potential features and functions Online.

On that note, while we'd like to improve our Web site, we're already happy to be off the collegepublisher network for now - in the course of that transition to an independent site our archives did suffer a blow (pretty much any tangible problem with our current web site was created by the designers, and our main fault is in not having been able to fix it all yet). But, resources willing, we're definitely looking to restore order in our house too.

For CC, I'm excited to see a new, really useful (and sleek) site come from two students' hard work and hopefully I can use it next semester to choose my classes.
Posted by whuh? : #35 (in reply to #33) · reply · track
October 14, 2008 at 4:21 PM
Spec's online archives go back to 2000, it looks like. (Probably when they first had a website.) Don't know about articles getting cut off.

I think the Spec site is flawed, but the DP and Crimson? Really? They make my eyes bleed.
Posted by oooooh : #36 · reply · track
October 15, 2008 at 2:08 PM (from campus)
syncs with blackberries??? exciting!
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
36 °F, Partly Cloudy

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.