It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

Fox takes names

For those of you wondering how Speakergate '07 played out, Chris Szabla took these notes under his blue gown during the speeches.

First, Fox called out a Spec quotee:

"Matthew Fox singled out Julia Kite for saying that she didn't know who Fox was, and Prezbo followed with 'Julia, I didn't know who he was either,' adding, 'Don't worry, he's gone now.'"

And then things got political:

"When Quigley introduced Prezbo as being 'farsighted with regard to the spatial planning needs of the university' or something, people understood it as a reference to Manhattanville and started booing. Conversely, there were seemingly cheers whenever OMA was mentioned."

And Quigley made a charming chronological faux pas:

"Also, Quigley called us 'toddlers of the early 80s,' (though most of us were born from 1984-6) then chatter ensued, at which point he looked up, thought a moment, and just continued. Recycled speech?"

Spec takes a more measured approach here.

UPDATE, 9:15 PM: In a surprising upset, SEAS Class Day speaker Santiago Calatrava disappointed. By one account, his accent was positively Havelesque, and the speech ("one long drone about public service") dropped the phrase "challenges of engineering" about 10 times.

Also, the SEAS senior fund claims about 100% participation. CC got 83%. HOW DO THEY DO IT?

In other news, everyone's favorite gay-basher just died.


Posted by lskfslkf : #1 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 7:10 PM
fox was positively charming, and his charisma inspiring. (who else was cringing after the dumbass jocks screamed "JACK!!!" for the 18th time?)

klagge's speech really captured the ethos of the class of 2007 nicely. that is, it was a boring, uncreative, packaged rambling by a striving, diligent finance hopeful. perhaps they might have given lackner a chance to speak, possibly giving us a chance to hear the insights of a real genius.
Posted by hairs : #2 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 7:18 PM
I thought Klagge did a nice job. Fox impressed me, although I thought his speech could have used some editing... the ad-libbed part where he talked about his job interview was a lot more fun to listen to than the repetitive stuff he seemed to have had written down.

Best moment, hands-down, was when Quigley quoted The Little Engine That Could.
Posted by cc2007 : #3 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 7:28 PM
fox killed. he was so self deprecating and made a truly enjoyable speech. my grandparents, afterward, who obviously had no idea who he was, couldnt stop saying that he was charming that that they couldnt imagine a better speech.

congrats 07!!
Posted by pleasantly surprised : #4 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 7:47 PM
As someone who was very skeptical about Fox, I was wrong, and he did a great job. Addressed everyone's "wtf?" reaction to his selection at the start, getting it out of the way so he could give a heartfelt, meaningful speech that was actually about something.

Thumbs up!
Posted by erjeqriq : #5 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 7:49 PM
Julia, marry me. For real.
Posted by well : #6 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 8:13 PM
I thought presbo's quip about Fox was sort of rude.

Then again, I have a teenybopper crush on Matthew Fox.
Posted by I thought : #7 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 8:28 PM
Fox did a fantastic job. When he started out by listing all of the previous speakers, and quoted the spec...it was fabulous.

Quigley's 'puff puff, chug chug' was the best moment ever.
Posted by why : #8 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 8:38 PM
why is quigley so intollerable? fox was fine. woohoo ghostwriters.
Posted by fox : #9 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 8:43 PM
was amazing. sorry to have doubted the man. the actual speech was excellent and his intro was just pure genius. my favorite part was the part where he compared himself to bill gates noting that "unlike mr. gates, i am actually a college graduate."

bollinger's quip was rude but fox was gone at that point as bollinger pointed out, and it was genuine. bollinger is oblivious to tons of shit and he just wanted to make that point. i found it hilarious. today's winners were matt fox, julia kite, quigley and bollinger, pretty much in that order.
Posted by intolerable : #10 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 8:47 PM
not quigley. columbo. that man is such a bore.
Posted by i thought : #11 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 9:25 PM
klagge's speech was brave and honest. go nick.
Posted by huh? : #12 (in reply to #9) · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 9:29 PM
bollinger, a winner? were you there? he was rude and arrogant and seemed like he thought he had better places to be.

but also, considering his fall from greatness after his affirmative action stuff, i was not surprised.

and matthew fox: fabulous, and even better looking in person,
Posted by lost : #13 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 10:24 PM
is the best show on TV. You have to be a pretentious ass not to know who he is...
Posted by McFister : #14 (in reply to #13) · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 10:39 PM
Some people have interests other than television.
Posted by And others : #15 (in reply to #14) · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 11:12 PM
lack the self-importance to believe that being interested in or watching television somehow precludes you from having other interests.
Posted by dude : #16 · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 11:38 PM
some people don't watch Lost. chill out and deal with it. There are other shows (House, baseball/basketball, The Office) and other things to do with your life.
Posted by Yeah : #17 (in reply to #15) · reply · track
May 15, 2007 at 11:49 PM
I didn't know who Matthew Fox was until the whole Speakergate thing.
Posted by yes : #18 (in reply to #16) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 12:10 AM
of course, but it's the fact that people take pride in not knowing. They think they're "too important" (too good?) to know something like a television show. The great thing, however, is that there will be more cocktail, interview and business conversations about movies and tv than 17th century lit.
Posted by Uh... : #19 (in reply to #18) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 12:15 AM
hopefully better TV than "Lost." "Lost" is the essence of stupid.

In fact, the post you're replying to specifically mentions lots of things on TV. Pop culture != culture.
Posted by don't : #20 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 12:23 AM
tease me about Ann Coulter like that!!
Posted by Julia Kite : #21 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 12:24 AM
I love this school.
Posted by McFister : #22 (in reply to #18) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 1:39 AM
Who is in the cast of "Lost" is of no consequence.
Posted by SEAS : #23 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 1:56 AM
pwns again. Take that you finance whores!
Posted by Shallow : #24 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 2:10 AM
Dear Columbia,

When in doubt, please get more pretty men to speak to me for eight minutes. Or just put them on stage for me to stare at longingly. Who needs distinguished careers when you have scruffy beards and soulful eyes.

Love,

Yes, I am that shallow.
Posted by CML : #25 (in reply to #16) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 2:42 AM
What about Jeopardy and South Park! South Park = the best serialized social commentary since the days of Dickens.
Posted by I love : #26 (in reply to #21) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 2:48 AM
you Julia Kite.
Posted by DHI : #27 (in reply to #13) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 2:49 AM
There's nothing pretentious about not knowing who's in shows you don't watch, and there's nothing pretentious about not watching a particular show, especially a serial show that is pretty dependent on watching every episode from what I gather. I don't get mad at people who don't know the cast of 24, hell I've watched like 90 episodes and I don't even know the name of David Palmer/Allstate commercial guy.
Posted by ... : #28 (in reply to #27) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 3:05 AM
His name is Pedro Cerrano.
Posted by Hah. : #29 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 6:02 AM
Falwell's obit has "Tinky Winky" on the first page. That's as lovely a bit of karma as I've seen all year.
Posted by Um, actually, : #30 (in reply to #27) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 6:37 AM
The name of the actor who played President David Palmer on ‘24’ is Dennis Haysbert. As you mentioned, he currently can also be seen in those “That’s Allstate’s stand. Are you in good hands?” commercials, and in ‘The Unit’ on CBS. He had a role in Michael Mann’s 1995 classic, ‘Heat’.

[external link to www.imdb.com]
Posted by quiqui : #31 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 8:23 AM
Why hasn't anyone commented on how much the salutorian's speech sucked? At least where I was sitting, people were snickering during parts.
Posted by quiqui : #32 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 8:25 AM
Ugh, that should say "salutatorian."
Posted by falwell : #33 (in reply to #31) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 8:26 AM
it certainly made my parents squirm during parts. it made our campus sound like it was run by racist bigots, and felt like it was meant to launch a PC crusade - or would have, if it wasn't so monotone. I like nick, but yeah. it reflected the degree to which spec and all the "culture groups" really overplayed tiny little "bias incidents" that don't speak for campus culture as a whole.
Posted by hmph : #34 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 8:29 AM
the system is antiquated and fatally flawed. one day, universities will recognize that those students with the best grades (which almost always stem from fields in which the assignments are objectively scored) do not neccessarily make the best (or most appropriate) speakers. nick's a great guy, but the past four years have hardly been generic for me, i see no reason why that should change on class day.
Posted by chait : #35 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 8:31 AM
in the end we all have to stop ragging on prezbo, fox, and nick and unite around the fact that chait's speech was by far the worst in that lineup.
Posted by video? : #36 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 9:50 AM
anyone have video of class day (of the speeches)? i was in france.
Posted by X.J. : #37 (in reply to #36) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 10:04 AM
[external link to www.columbia.edu]
Posted by look! : #38 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 10:52 AM
[external link to www.people.com]
Posted by squealy : #39 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 12:14 PM
Congrats, Julia! Just here to add to the love.
Posted by actually... : #40 (in reply to #38) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 1:01 PM
the link you meant to post is this:

[external link to www.people.com]
Posted by actually... : #41 (in reply to #40) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 1:03 PM
people.com says Fox is a former alum...i guess they don't have copy editors
Posted by justjared : #42 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 1:23 PM
[external link to justjared.buzznet.com]
Posted by DHI : #43 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 1:44 PM
Well now I know.
Posted by #13 is wrong : #44 · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 3:44 PM
The Wire, not Lost, is the best show on television
Posted by rjt : #45 (in reply to #19) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 6:50 PM
I'm not sure how I feel about pop culture not being equal to culture. What is culture today, then? Arthouse movements that affect and are noticed by less than 1% of the population?
Posted by Well : #46 (in reply to #45) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 8:53 PM
I didn't mean that anything popular is bad, fun as it is to hold that opinion. But the segments of culture that are designed specifically for popular appeal, rather than some intrinsic artistic purpose (say, Britney Spears versus basically any band that writes its own songs), are basically just a sin.

I put Lost in this category, I mean, but it's probably not unreasonable to disagree. But there's a difference between culture and the culture industry.
Posted by I'm sorry : #47 (in reply to #12) · reply · track
May 16, 2007 at 11:27 PM
you clearly are either a) biased against Bollinger or b) were not at the ceremony. Perhaps you're just another columbia activist in desperate search of a cause.

Bollinger sounded like he needed to be somewhere else? Then why did he stay for the entire ceremony and shake every graduates hand? I don't think he does that for every school ceremony.

And the Matthew Fox comment? If anything it was a little chivalrous in that he bailed out Julia after she was publicly called out in the middle of class day.

Grow up.

And for those of you knocking Nick? Yeah it was a little overdramatized, but guess what, so has nearly every speech ever delivered by a student. And Nick isn't a finance striver, he is in fact a quantitative genius. So the speech was hackneyed- oh well. I think it was decent. Someone should have addressed the fact that nearly every year at Columbia is filled with turmoil and that MEANS something. I'm glad he did, and not some trite person.

Chait's speech was standard cliched fare. Can't expect much else.

And who asked Arvind Kadaba to follow up his class gift presentation with a speech and a half???
Posted by BC'07 : #48 · reply · track
May 17, 2007 at 9:17 AM
I just watched the video, and Fox did well. Too bad bwog didn't cover the Barnard graduation though. Anna Deavere Smith did impersonations! (although, as should be expected, many speeches had a strong and almost obnoxious "Girl-Power" aspect)
Posted by then : #49 (in reply to #21) · reply · track
May 18, 2007 at 4:33 PM
why were you unwilling to donate a single dollar to it? BECAUSE YOU'RE A HYPOCRIT. julia spoke at the john jay award dinner (which brings in 1.2 million for financial aid) about how alums' donations to columbia enabled her to travel to scotland or something and about how financial aid has made her life wonderful etc etc. and then when approached to give $1 to the senior fund refused.... if you don't think financial aid is important, then don't donate to the senior fund... but if you're willing to get up in front of 800 people and talk about how your life has been bettered by the generosity of alums then why the hell not give $1? julia= the epitome of hypocrisy.
Posted by yes : #50 (in reply to #49) · reply · track
May 18, 2007 at 6:51 PM
i agree completely.
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
26 °F, Fair

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: info@eastasiareview.org

The Columbia East Asia Review is currently accepting submissions for its 2009 edition. Research papers from all disciplines and majors are welcome. For more information and submission details, please visit us at www.eastasiareview.org

or e-mail us at info@eastasiareview.org. The deadline for submissions is January 24, 2009.
East Asia Review Website


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.