It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

"I'm Not There": A Yorkie Roundtable

Several Bwog editors retrieved the passwords of their middle school AIM screen names and entered a chatroom to discuss Todd Haynes' new Dylan "biopic" I'm Not There. Heath Ledger was taken down a notch, David Cross was lauded, and Yorkie avatars were chosen.

Today's Yorkie Roundtable features:

Armin Rosen

Andrew Flynn

Maryam Parhizkar

Lucy Tang

Juli Weiner



So... let's begin. Who was everyone's favorite Dylan?

Cate Blanchett followed by Ben Wishaw

Well I'm gonna be the iconoclast here and say Richard Gere

Totally disagree. Couldn't disagree more.

I hated his whole segment. It was really pretty but so out of place.

It's a masturbatory reference. It was just a live Dylan song.

It was such a lazy Fellini rip-off

It summed up the whole movie in my mind—exactly because it was awkward, out of place and utterly masturbatory

Wasn't the spider a Fellini rip-off?

Probably. Or a Spiderman 2 rip-off.

I kind of liked the Richard Gere segment

But it had shitty writing. Like the kind of writing Dylan does when he writes long form

But if you're trying to make a self-consciously self-indulgent movie that lures Dylan maniacs like myself into a false sense of security...

I think the film wasn't critical enough of Dylan

Was that the point though?

It could still be critical and objective and still look cool

Dylan is one of those artists that people really obsess about and I think the movie was a study in obsession, in a lot of ways

But critical of what? His politics? His general douchiness?

I have to agree on that actually, it did portray him as that sort of enigmatic legend of folk music

Like the reviewer from NY Press said, it's more about Todd Haynes that it is about Dylan

Right, so wouldn't it be cool to present him in a different way, and not just a fawning fan-boy way. Like, wow, he was kind of an asshole to his wife

But how critical of Dylan can you really be? Even his bad traits have been mythologized. Slow Train Coming has even gone down as a half-decent album.

Oh man, I think the 80s is not given enough credit at all

My kids'll probably be listening to Under the Red Sun, which sucked. Like there's nothing off of Oh Mercy? C'mon Todd Haynes

Slow Train Coming is great

I'm glad they include the weird shit about his foray into Pentecostal choirs

Yeah, but it wasn't done right

I mean, he really got into this ridiculous idiom, where if you hear his songs played now, without Dylan, the sound entirely organic to the tradition

This rambly, not making any fucking sense idiom

That Dylan though, didn't even get a separate actor

Are you actually arguing for more Dylans? There should have been less Dylan. 12 year old Dylan didn't need to be there

I don't know, I kind of appreciated 12-year old Dylan

I loved him. That velvet voice...

I feel like the novelty wore off after about 3 seconds

Except the part where Richie Havens was dubbed really poorly

Richie Havens! High point of the movie. Oh wait take that back David Cross as Allen Ginsberg.

Yes David Cross was great

I love the part with him and Cate just going nuts

That was very Renaldo and Clara

The whole movie was very Renaldo and Clara. I thought that the Heath Ledger part went nowhere

In fact, every remotely romantic part was strange

It was worth it for Charlotte Gainsbourg

It was worth it for the brief glimpse of the scornful, Blood on the Tracks-era Dylan. That was another of the film's strengths/weaknesses: soooooo many references

I read somewhere about a reporter asking Jacob Dyaln if he ever listened to his father and he said every album except for Blood on the Tracks

Christian Bale: friend or enemy?

Frenemy?

I'd have to say he was my least favorite

He just seemed like he was doing an SNL-esque impersonation of Dylan the whole time

It was still possible to enjoy it without being a Dylan-connoisseur

But it might leave a viewer confused if he/she didn't know much about Dylan

That's only if you get caught up with trying to understand every single reference

The point was that Dylan was really just a figment of our collective, popular imagination

But what is it, other than a sick whirlwind vanity tour through Dylan references?

It seemed like 2 1/2 hours of fan fiction at times, which is extremely masturbatory if the end message is that we'll project whatever we want onto some abstract "Dylan. Yeah. If the message is that celebrity is what the mob makes of it, then that's as good as there being no end message. But fuck it, the music was great.


Posted by : #1 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:10 PM
metamasturbation
Posted by silly : #2 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:12 PM
I like how you have to clarify that you dug up your AIM screen names from middle school. Because obviously, once you're an intellectual Bwogger, it becomes totally uncool to use AIM, and God forbid you actually admit to using it!
Posted by jeez : #3 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:29 PM
every time Bwog staff jerks off to its own conversation, God kills a kitten.
Posted by do you guys : #4 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:34 PM
think this is ok because of that sad n+1 pamphlet? read a fucking book.
Posted by ms. parhizakar: : #5 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:38 PM
i think your puppy icon might actually be a west highland terrier. i think this because this morning, when i woke up, i for some reason had the impulse to search for west highland terriers in google image.

damn they's cute.

Posted by Lucy : #6 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:42 PM
1. My avatar is a dead yorkie.

2. Just to bring the pretension down a few notches, one quote that got censored, "my favorite Wallflowers (Jakob Dylan) album is Bringing Down the Horse."
Posted by beh : #7 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:47 PM
this is like one of gawker's cross-promotional AIM chats with julia alison.
Posted by but she's glamorous! : #8 (in reply to #7) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:49 PM
[external link to www.vimeo.com]
Posted by Andrew Flynn : #9 (in reply to #4) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:51 PM
I don't read books on principle.
Posted by Question : #10 (in reply to #9) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:57 PM
Is bwog allowed to select its own comments as favorites?
Posted by Actually : #11 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 2:58 PM
Now that I think about it, it's roughly the same thing as having a blog post featuring only comments from editors in the first place.
Posted by Andrew Flynn : #12 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 3:00 PM
Geez, calm down everyone.
Posted by DHI : #13 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 3:06 PM
I still gotta see this movie.
Posted by I regret : #14 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 3:13 PM
having read this.
Posted by Anonymous : #15 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 4:28 PM
Editors should never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever be heard from in this way. If you thought this post would go over well, you were drunk or making a terrible decision.
Posted by where : #16 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 5:29 PM
was DHI in this....isn't he, like, the dylan expert on bwog?
Posted by Oh look : #17 (in reply to #10) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 5:52 PM
They did.
Posted by Bwog : #18 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 6:27 PM
Is funny when it tries to do things gawker-esque things (I guess instant message conversations can be seen anywhere, but I just wanted to say gawker-esque).

Now...where's OUR lolcait?!
Posted by I'm also : #19 (in reply to #18) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 6:28 PM
an idiot! "tries to do things gawker-esque things." One of those "things" don't belong. Can you guess which one?
Posted by ZvS : #20 (in reply to #6) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 6:39 PM
Oh, to HELL with that. (Breach) is way better, and I will fight you.
Posted by the quote : #21 (in reply to #17) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 6:50 PM
they selected is not funny. bwog have you reached the dizzying heights of your own pretension? this post sucked big hairy balls
Posted by andre flynn : #22 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 7:07 PM
is the best. yorkie the candy bar, absolutely brilliant. i don't really understand anything else of this post, but that in itself makes it laudable.
Posted by Sprinkles : #23 (in reply to #22) · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 7:33 PM
Do not feed the birds!
Posted by Agreed : #24 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 8:25 PM
This was stupid
Posted by brneyedgurlxoxo : #25 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 8:32 PM
what's the point of using old middle school aim screen names if you don't print them?
Posted by ... : #26 · reply · track
November 28, 2007 at 11:40 PM
I am a fan of bwog and I read it all the time but I have to say that this was a phenomenally stupid post.
Posted by Avi Zenilman : #27 (in reply to #2) · reply · track
November 29, 2007 at 12:08 AM
Bwoggers don't use AIM. They use gchat. But you can't have chatrooms on gchat.
Posted by DHI (Site staff): #28 (in reply to #16) · reply · track
November 29, 2007 at 12:47 AM
I chose not to participate on account of having no respect for those tiny fake dogs. What kind of dog lives in a damn teacup? But for real, I just didn't see the movie in time.
Posted by DHI : #29 · reply · track
November 29, 2007 at 12:58 AM
Also, Rosen, are you saying Slow Train Coming was a bad album? If so, there's a slow train coming for you.
Posted by DHI : #30 · reply · track
November 29, 2007 at 1:12 AM
I'm with Flynn on the 80s. Not only are there more solid albums than people realize, the fucking outtakes from that period are great. Blind Willie McTell?
Posted by sigh : #31 · reply · track
November 29, 2007 at 10:56 AM
I look forward to Bwog when I'm not paying attention in classes, but when my horrible music hum section is more interesting than the post, it crushes my soul. this is one of those instances. thanks bwog, for making me pay attention in class for once.
Posted by JNW: : #32 · reply · track
November 29, 2007 at 1:37 PM
We saw the Fellini film last Tuesday. It was not one of his best. It lacks a cohesive structure. You know, you get the feeling that he's not absolutely sure what it is he wants to say. 'Course, I've always felt he was essentially a - a technical film maker. Granted, La Strada was a great film. Great in its use of negative imagery more than anything else. But that simple, cohesive core...

Stick to ZIPCAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Ugh : #33 · reply · track
November 30, 2007 at 1:44 AM
Waste of time.
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
32 °F, Fair

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: info@eastasiareview.org

The Columbia East Asia Review is currently accepting submissions for its 2009 edition. Research papers from all disciplines and majors are welcome. For more information and submission details, please visit us at www.eastasiareview.org

or e-mail us at info@eastasiareview.org. The deadline for submissions is January 24, 2009.
East Asia Review Website


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.