It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

Incapacitation and Its Discontents

Much in the news today about paying for college and college paying for you. American studies director Andrew Delbanco and former dean of students Roger Lehecka co-wrote a New York Times article about Harvard and Yale's distribution of financial aid. Our Ivy brethren to the north, in an attempt to make attending college possible for "families across the spectrum", have re-calculated their financial aid allocations to benefit families earning between $120k and $180k per year.

They argue that this decision will compel other universities to do the same--helping out more middle class and upper-middle class families. The problem is that most (read: all) schools simply do not have Harvard or Yale's budget. In all likelihood, the money going towards funding an upper-middle class student's education is going to prevent many poorer students from receiving aid at all. The article also argues that most upper-middle class and middle class students are deserving of aid, but most "find a way to attend college." Most poorer ones do not.

At $5.94 billion, Columbia's endowment is paltry compared to Harvard ($35 billion) and Yale ($20 billion)—Kluge non-withstanding. It will be interesting to see if Columbia follows suit—after all, Yale only did this as a response to Harvard, with whom they knew they would be competing for students. But Columbia can't afford to compete in the same financial league as Harvard and Yale, and poorer students can't afford to have CU try.

Meanwhile, on the shadier side of business deals, the Associated Press is reporting that the relationship between study abroad programs and universities (including dear Alma Mater), is coming under fire. The New York Attorney General's office has found links between colleges choosing certain programs and receiving perks—for instance, a program financing school administrators to stay in Rome for two weeks in order to check up on the program for four days. Columbia is one of 15 schools that has received subpoenas. The article was published quite serendipitously, as many students are heading en masse to JFK in the next week to go overseas for the semester. Bon voyage!

- JNW


Posted by Uh... : #1 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 11:41 AM
You might want to try running this one through the proof-reader again. Bwog.
Posted by Christine CC'04 : #2 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Actually, I think the article was really setting itself up to talk about the government's role in funding education:

"For every college to become accessible to talented students regardless of income, the federal government must create enhanced grant programs, progressive tax incentives and programs that reduce the debt of graduates who spend time in public service."
Posted by albaniac : #3 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 1:00 PM
andrew cuomo wastes his time "solving" small fry scandals (that is, when he's not creating them). spitzer should just pull a musharraf and consolidate the attorney general and governor's offices into an all powerful corruption witchhunt machine.
Posted by how come pirates : #4 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 1:28 PM (from campus)
get to go to columbia for free?

Financial Raid!
Posted by ... : #5 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 2:02 PM (from campus)
%!%!%!% COLUMBIA FINANCIAL AID COMPUTAR PROCESSING YOUR FILE %!%!%!%!%%! PLEASE PAY PAY PAY PAY PAY @!@!@!@!@!@
Posted by why : #6 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 2:40 PM (from campus)
does this post disparage on Columbia. Bwog acts like we don't compete with Yale and Harvard for students.
Posted by better written : #7 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 3:06 PM (from campus)
[external link to www.nytimes.com]
Posted by endowment : #8 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 3:18 PM (from campus)
I am pretty sure our endowment is now somewhere in the mid-$7 billion range.

Looks like you got the $5.94 straight off a Google search, which shows data from 2005, I think. That was before the Columbia Campaign was started. I wouldn't be surprised to see our endowment reach $10+ billion in another two years.

You also reason that lower class aid packages would be hurt by giving more to middle class students, that is simply wrong. Columbia would not start to neglect low income students by diverting aid to middle class students, they would just start to distribute any new financial aid funds to a much wider spectrum of students. (read: more students will receive help without compromising the packages of those already receiving it.) The NYTimes article assumes that Harvard and Yale are going in the wrong direction by giving middle class students more money from their endowments, when really that is the only direction they can take. I predict Harvard and Princeton, maybe Yale, will eliminate tuition altogether within the next 10 years.
Posted by Christine CC'04 : #9 (in reply to #8) · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 3:40 PM
Right. I don't think the article is an indictment against distributing funds to a wider group or that H/Y are doing it, but that these initiatives don't actually address the high costs of education at large for those who can't afford it. Whereas other schools may want to follow suit, most schools don't have the endowment to absorb the costs. The onus of responsibility can't be on individual schools but on something bigger.
Posted by endowed : #10 · reply · track
January 22, 2008 at 10:43 PM
I concur with #8. The logic of the author is entirely flawed. It is preposterous to suggest that the intent of this new financial aid system is to deny assistance to poorer students- many of whom are not paying any tuition whatsoever, in fact, under the generous grant policy. I would add that it is also absurd to wholeheartedly accept the absurd attestations of our university administrators, who, in the midst of a capital campaign, would have you believe that our school is under financial duress. The fact that we do not have as much money as our peers does not make us poor as an intitution. Donald Trump can hardly compete with Warren Buffet, but one would hardly call him deprived.
Posted by Elna, '08 : #11 · reply · track
January 23, 2008 at 12:03 AM (from campus)
What has not really been addressed by the article, and seems to be misundertsood, is that Harvard's decision to extend greater aid to middle and upper-middle class students does not affect recruitment or admissions policies. For need-blind institutions, generally and ideally, financial aid packages are developed after acceptance from a rigorous pool of applicants. What Harvard's new plan does is make it easier for all accepted students to chose Harvard over full-ride state or other university's scholarship packages. My own college application process was frought with decisions on whether to choose full-ride Penn State over Columbia and NYU. Even though my family makes around 100,000, we would have been expected to pay for almost $30,000/year at NYU, which is entirely impossible. Thank god Columbia was need-blind. I think that what Delbano really should have emphasized in his article is not just that middle/upper-middle classs students now have access to better funding, but that these initiatives are not being coupled with a better minority or lower-income/rural/inner-city student recruitment program. That is more of a problem than alleviating the debt of an over-taxed, underserviced, heavily indebted income level in American society.
Posted by problems : #12 · reply · track
January 23, 2008 at 9:56 PM
I can't speak for the recruitment problem that you mention, but I would say that a much larger problem is the public school system in rural/inner-city areas. You cannot recruit students who unfortunately have not acquired an adequate high-school education.
Posted by anonymous : #13 (in reply to #12) · reply · track
January 24, 2008 at 9:28 AM
Let me correct you: We -should not- recruit students without an adequate high school education.

And yet, day after day, I suspect that Columbia does not always follow this advice.
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
31 °F, Partly Cloudy

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: info@eastasiareview.org

The Columbia East Asia Review is currently accepting submissions for its 2009 edition. Research papers from all disciplines and majors are welcome. For more information and submission details, please visit us at www.eastasiareview.org

or e-mail us at info@eastasiareview.org. The deadline for submissions is January 24, 2009.
East Asia Review Website


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.