It's Winter Break! Bwog will be moving in slow motion.

J-School Rapist Found Guilty

The Associated Press is reporting that Robert Williams, the ex-convict charged with torturing and raping a Journalism School student last year was found guilty of 44 of 46 counts.

For further details -- though Bwog warns that it's extremely disturbing -- the New York Times has a detailed summation of the events of the 19-hour torture session.


Posted by Sprinkles : #1 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 6:33 PM
The J-School student is the bravest woman I could possibly imagine and I only hope she is one day able to live a normal life.
Posted by other blog : #2 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 6:41 PM
Spec has also been doing an amazing day-by-day blog on the trial: [external link to www.columbiaspectator.com]
Posted by question : #3 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 6:47 PM
what were the two counts for which he was somehow NOT guilty?

Posted by oops : #4 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 6:50 PM
answering my own question, this is from the spec website:

"Williams was found not guilty of the charge of assault in the 1st degree causing serious physical injury with dangerous instrument, the knife, or of assault in the 1st degree with intent to disfigure, again with the knife."

...ok seriously, how is he NOT GUILTY of those? 44/46 is pretty good but I was hoping for a perfect score on this one. Here's hoping he does get life in prison, no parole.
Posted by speechless.. : #5 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 6:55 PM
this guy should not be allowed to live..

i wish all the best for the woman...
Posted by So, : #6 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 6:56 PM (from campus)
Anybody want to argue that the Death Penalty isn't a fair verdict in this case? I used to believe that we don't have the right to take other human beings' lives, but now I've come to believe that animals on the other hand.....

This sick fuck should be tortured to death.
Posted by the Man '07 : #7 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 7:13 PM
Whether or not you can give the DP for a non-homicide case will depend on the outcome of Louisiana v. Kennedy (child rape case, DP handed down by trial court and upheld up to US Supreme Court)

The Supreme Court should have an opinion fairly soon...
Posted by anon : #8 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 7:16 PM
this guy deserves the electric chair- or rather something much more painful- he should have to die the same way he tortured this poor woman
Posted by i don't know : #9 (in reply to #8) · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 8:01 PM (from campus)
no one deserves to die for what they have done. although this was absolutely terrible beyond words....killing him doesn't seem right
Posted by falsee : #10 (in reply to #9) · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 8:10 PM (from campus)
erroneous.

Posted by cupcake : #11 (in reply to #9) · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 8:33 PM (from campus)
you sir, are wrong.

Posted by anonymo : #12 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 8:33 PM
i don't believe in the death penalty, mainly because life in prison is a worse punishment than any death penalty - we all win.
Posted by I wonder : #13 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 8:39 PM
what Anthony Kelley has to say about this. Maybe something like how we need to engage in life-affirming sharing of feelings and fears.
Posted by may he : #14 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 8:53 PM
rot in solitary confinement whenever his asshole isn't being torn to shreds. Rapists don't do well in prison.
Posted by DHI : #15 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 9:09 PM
A lot of people deserve a lot of things; that doesn't make me comfortable with allowing the government to do those things to people.
Posted by Win-Win : #16 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 9:40 PM
Maybe the other prisoners can torture him into killing himself? Thoughts?
Posted by 1200000000 : #17 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 10:14 PM (from campus)
My God...
Posted by yeah : #18 · reply · track
June 24, 2008 at 11:23 PM
fuck the death penalty. handing him such an immediate death would be letting him off far too easily.
Posted by Well... : #19 (in reply to #7) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 1:11 AM
As of now, New York has no death penalty. The Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional in 2004, and a new statute has yet to be proposed.
Posted by Self Defense : #20 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 2:28 AM
I read about this case in detail only about two weeks ago, and purely because of it I started taking a rigorous self defense class. The first thing we learned is how to get out of a choke hold. Women (and men), please follow my example and learn some form of self defense. I'm taking Krav Maga at John Jay College ( [external link to www.kravmagafederation.com]
Posted by Yeah... : #21 (in reply to #12) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 2:30 AM (from campus)
because paying for this jack-hole to live a better life than he did outside of prison is certainly worth the money.

Why put money toward allowing this guy to live longer so he can "dwell " on his punishment? He knows exactly what he did, and exactly what consequences could have come of it. I really don't see any reason to punish him further or attempt to rehabilitate him, just wipe that trash off the face of the Earth in the most painful and appropriate way possible.

Posted by enforcing : #22 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 6:22 AM
the death penalty is more expensive than keeping someone in jail for life so the money argument doesn't work
Posted by what?? : #23 (in reply to #19) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 9:04 AM
but benson and stabler always tell those rapists that if they dont confess and work with the popos, their looking at the death penalty up in sing sing.
Posted by hmmm : #24 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 9:39 AM
As it stands now the death penalty is more expensive due to the incredibly byzantine bureaucracy and appeal system that is far too good for some people.

While I realize many people like to use the 'death penalty is actually more expensive' argument with a smug little grin on their face, it seems as if for some rather horrendous crimes the appeals process should be leapfrogged straight to the highest possible court, therefore negating this legal loophole.

And how does killing him not seem right? We kill cows and pigs every day that have more of a right to exist and have done less to harm humans than this piece of worthless garbage.
Posted by Human : #25 (in reply to #24) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 9:55 AM
The appeals system is in place because, as open-and-shut as this case may appear to be, there are still a lot of mistakes in the judicial system, and you really want to be sure before you punish someone irrevocably. Imagine if somehow they just convicted the wrong guy for this crime, maybe someone who looked similar. It's happened before.

And as for killing swine, we eat them. They are not human. This guy, barbarous and worthless though he may be is a human being. Unless you're suggesting we cannibalize him too, there's something that's still off about killing him.
Posted by Hmmm : #26 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 10:40 AM (from campus)
Is he a human being? I think we really need to be asking ourselves that. I would like to believe that the word "human being" rather than homo sapien requires some level of empathy for others, which, in my opinion, this guy has forfeited through his actions.

And frankly this guy didn't even contest the charges. Assuming that his lawyers weren't trying to use the judicial equivalent of a Hail Mary play, he did it and attempted to plead insanity.

I feel as if many people have been indoctrinated by the nanny state, taught that all have some inherent worth. Let's be honest, what kind of self-important, hate-filled monster would you have to be to do this? Do any of you think you could do the same thing? Then why do you place yourself in the same category of 'humanity' as him?

On a lighter note, how would you people feel about a prison island? Escape from New York anyone? Maybe the world's largest game of red rover with entirety of the student population with baseball bats on the other end.
Posted by oh my god : #27 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 10:54 AM
holy shit. I am actually, truly, speechless.
Posted by On a side note... : #28 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 11:27 AM
Does anyone feel bad for the defense attorney?

Given the evidence, I think it takes a lot for someone to convince himself of his client's innocence. I followed Spec's coverage of the case, and it seemed like Levine was arguing that they got the wrong guy. Then his stance eventually changed to 'mentally unfit'. I don't know how Levine can walk around without shame after a case like this. On the flip side, he must have really believed in what he was doing to see the case through...gutsy.

In a case like this, I'd have thought any self respecting lawyer would be fighting for a more lenient punishment. But I guess that's what the appeal is for.

That said, I hope Williams is skinned alive. Hey, if we wish hard enough, maybe it'll come true.
Posted by SVU fan : #29 (in reply to #23) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 12:29 PM (from campus)
That's only in reruns! They're actually faithful to the current extent of the law, and periodically discuss pending legislation.
Posted by my guess : #30 (in reply to #28) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM
"That said, I hope Williams is skinned alive. Hey, if we wish hard enough, maybe it'll come true."

Well, my guess is that he'll be in a pretty rough prison. I'm sure he'll have his share of violence in there.
Posted by ... : #31 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 1:08 PM
this is terrifying
Posted by hmm : #32 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 1:24 PM
I wonder why NYT decided to relate the incident with such excruciating detail. I've haven't seen rape cases covered like this before.

Certainly serves the purpose of invoking some unrivalled fury
Posted by speaking of which : #33 (in reply to #7) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 1:53 PM
[external link to www.scotuswiki.com]

It has to be murder to get the death penalty.

Posted by excuse me : #34 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 1:54 PM
it has to take life to get the death penalty.
Posted by violence : #35 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 2:16 PM
violence violence violence

it's not the answer to everything
Posted by Hmmm : #36 (in reply to #35) · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 2:43 PM (from campus)
It certainly is to some things.
Posted by huh : #37 · reply · track
June 25, 2008 at 10:15 PM
actually in certain particularly brutal cases, they've related even more than this

its great to see your trying to minimize this horrible incident to score despicable political points
Posted by i wonder... : #38 · reply · track
June 26, 2008 at 12:03 AM
i wonder how he can live with himself.
Posted by triviality : #39 · reply · track
June 26, 2008 at 12:10 AM
agreed with 37. Unfortunately, we go to Columbia, and some of our fellow students lack the sense to forgo their left wing equivalent of Bill-O-Factor commentary for an evening. Save the ACLU talking points, amici briefs, and SCOTUS links for law school, k thx
Posted by Uhhh : #40 (in reply to #22) · reply · track
June 26, 2008 at 3:00 AM
That is only because of the retarded laws that allow them to appeal. If those ridiculous laws were changed it was quite save quite a bit of money.
Posted by haha : #41 · reply · track
June 26, 2008 at 9:29 AM
right because we should absolutely kill people without carefully considering it and without regard to any mistake made in the trial. Obviously no innocent people are ever sentanced to death, and then have it overturned through appeal. I absolutely believe the appeals should not drag on forever, but if you are going to take someones life you have to be sure they are guilty.
Posted by oh please : #42 (in reply to #39) · reply · track
June 26, 2008 at 9:44 AM
How was #33 trying to score political points by pointing out that the death penalty wouldn't apply? ALSO, maintaing a stance against the death penalty isn't a lack of sense--it's the reasoned, thought-out opinion that the state shouldn't have the ability to kill human beings as punishment for their crimes, even if those crimes involve truly fucked up shit. Do I think this guy is a worthless scumbag whose despicability can't be properly described? Duh. Would I personally enjoy kicking him a lot? obvi. do I think it's actually a good idea to let me beat him up, or to let the state fry him? uh, no. If you really want to argue about the definition of "human beings," and from there debate about what humans (vs animals/monsters) deserve as punishment, go for it, but a reasoned stance against the death penalty isn't lame adherence to "aclu talking points." you lose all credibility by suggesting so.
Posted by tony eveready : #43 (in reply to #7) · reply · track
June 26, 2008 at 4:28 PM
you getting dp any goddamn way
Posted by name : #44 · reply · track
June 28, 2008 at 12:40 AM
I'm actually glad he's not getting the death penalty. Prisoners do not treat kindly those who have harmed women and children. The DP would be humane compared to what I'm sure awaits this monster in prison - repeated rape, daily beatings, the occasional shanking. I hope they give him a good working over, render him unrecognizable, and then eventually take it too far, leaving him just another stain on the prison floor.
Posted by question : #45 (in reply to #44) · reply · track
June 30, 2008 at 10:41 AM
i know that those who have harmed children are treated badly in prison, but what about a black man who has raped a white woman? i feel like i've read somewhere that in prison, that's worthy of a pat on the back etc from fellow prisoners? anyone else feel like they've read the same article as me and care to comment?
Posted by innneresting : #46 (in reply to #45) · reply · track
June 30, 2008 at 1:16 PM (from campus)
is that true? I wish this sick bastard gets raped repeatedly and faces daily humiliation. He will feel the wrath of his past heinous crimes coming down on him like a thousand spears piercing through his own eyes and heart.The other prisoners would flock to his mutilated body like birds of prey and crush him with their overpowering weight.

This is how a life-sentence at prison should be.

only then would the victim find justice in this oh so unfair judicial system.
Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.
32 °F, Fair

Search

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Our Favorite Comments

Generic Asshole: [read]
"Ew! How could you ever go to [popular Columbia spot]? It's overpriced and so fake! For REAL [service/product]..."
good analysis: [read]
"Dspar. But you know what, I think the real reason there was a crash is because there are far too few..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom. This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.

Events

01/10/2009


Apply now and keep everyone updated on the artistic pulse of the Columbia campus! Postcrypt Art Gallery is looking for a dedicated webmaster to maintain the official Postcrypt site, www.postcrypt.info. Please e-mail jenny@postcrypt.info with your name, year and school, experience, and statement of interest.

The application deadline is January 10, 2009.


01/24/2009

Contact email: info@eastasiareview.org

The Columbia East Asia Review is currently accepting submissions for its 2009 edition. Research papers from all disciplines and majors are welcome. For more information and submission details, please visit us at www.eastasiareview.org

or e-mail us at info@eastasiareview.org. The deadline for submissions is January 24, 2009.
East Asia Review Website


01/24/2009

Contact email: helvidius@columbia.edu

Publish that senior thesis! In its 20th year of publication, the Journal of Politics & Society is inviting submissions for its 2009 edition, which will be distributed in Barnes & Noble and Borders. Please email essays to helvidius@columbia.edu or visit http://www.helvedius.org
for more info. Deadline: January 24, 2009, all disciplines welcome.


01/26/2009

Contact email: cujh@columbia.edu

Positions on the editorial board are competitive, and choices are made by a committee of current editorial board members. To apply, send the following materials to cujh@columbia.edu with the subject line: Prospective Editor Application

Include your name, year, and majors and specializations;

A list of courses taken in the history department, or related courses relevant to the field of history (Philosophy of History; Historical Sociology, etc);

A writing sample of 5 to 7 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font dealing with a historical topic; it may be an excerpt from a larger paper, include a brief abstract if necessary;

An estimate of your availability for the Spring 2009 Semester; include other commitments and positions, and your ability to commit to the extensive reading and editing that a position on the editorial board requires.

The DEADLINE for all applications is JANUARY 26th, but we encourage you to prepare your application and send it right away. Email it with writing sample attached to: cujh@columbia.edu


02/01/2009

Contact email: periwynkle@gmail.com


Do you like to read and write about books, attend literary events/exhibitions, and frequent cafés and bookstores for readings by authors and poets? If you answered yes to any part of the above question, you should write for Spectator Books! My name is Yin Yin Lu, and I am the new Spectator A&E Books Editor. There are many benefits and inimitable opportunities for Books writers besides being able to see your name in print: interviewing all sorts of published writers, from debut novelists to Nobel Peace Prize winners, attending events at the NYPL, Symphony Space, book festivals, and museums for free, and getting free review copies of books before they are released! Last semester, for instance, I interviewed Lytton Smith and Karen Russell, both published graduates of the Columbia MFA program, attended a talk with critics James Wood and Daniel Mendelsohn at the NYPL, and heard Malcolm Gladwell speak at the New Yorker Festival.

Besides being exposed to these exciting opportunities, another reason you should write for Spectator Books is that it is not a long-term commitment - you can contribute as often or as little as you like. You can start your own column, write a recurring feature, or submit an article once every few weeks (or once the entire semester). Moreover, articles are flexible in terms of length and style, depending on whether they are features, reviews, or pieces for the Eye (Spectator's weekly arts and features magazine). Or you can post reviews of any length or style anytime you want on Spectacle, A&E's new and amazing blog.

There really are no obligations to being a Spec Books writer besides actually writing the articles that you want to. I will be sending e-mails with pitches and other information every week, and holding biweekly meetings at the Spec office, but those are not mandatory and are just an opportunity for me to assign pitches and meet my writers.

Completely enticed? Mildly interested? Still uncertain and would like more information? Whatever the case, e-mail me at periwynkle@gmail.com.


02/09/2009

Contact email: cufilmproductions@columbia.edu

Columbia Undergraduate Film Productions is launching our inaugural Production Season to write and produce original short films for our Film Festival!

CUFP Production Season will consist of intensive Screenwriters' Workshops and Directors' Workshops to offer you full creative and logistic support from your peers as you make your films on campus! We are looking for talented writers and directors who are passionate about film to create fresh, interesting material for our film festival.

Ideal candidates will be enthusiastic about film, dedicated to the workshop process, and excited to work on short films in a CUFP workshop setting. Workshops will be late Sunday afternoons and some Monday evenings.

The DEADLINE for Writers' Applications is Friday January 23.
The DEADLINE for Directors' Applications is Monday February 9

All Applicants: Send an e-mail with your name, e-mail, phone number, and school and class information to CUFPproductionseason@gmail.com. Please write a short personal statement (why are you interested in CUFP Production Season? How will you benefit from the workshop process?). Make sure to include all relevant experience with film and writing and/or directing.

**Writers: Please attach a screenwriting sample in Microsoft Word format. Writing sample should be maximum 5 pgs and should give us an idea of your narrative style and genre interest. It does not have to be the short film you will work on in workshop, but if it is not please include pitches/ideas for a short film you would like to workshop.


02/15/2009

Contact email: rhapsody@columbia.edu


Rhapsody in Blue, Columbia's urban affairs journal, having successfully, if belatedly gotten its first semester magazines in hand, is going to try again.

We're back to North America this semester. We need pitches from you. We want thoughtful, interesting, fun pieces that say something about cities. What are you interested in writing about? The first step is to send us a pitch--a paragraph about what you want to talk about, how will you do it? Pitches are due February 15. You'll hear from us if it's a go and drafts due a month later.

Old issues are on our website if you'd like to see more. Great opportunity to publish ideas from class, etc.

Send an email by us with any questions. Our FIRST MEETING for anyone interested in learning more about writing, editing, web or layout will be Wed, JAN 28, at 7:30, Broadway Piano Lounge. Also stay tuned for the study abroad blog, which should be going somewhere this semester. Let us know if you're interested in that as well.


01/6/2010

Contact email: bwog@columbia.edu

Email your event ads to bwog@columbia.edu.


Lost and Found

Lost (or found) an item? Email bwog@columbia.edu.