The Bwog
QuickBW
See also: Quickbw

Posted by keb: #1 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 6:05 AM
I love love love the facebook article. Keep up the good work next year!
Posted by nice: #2 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 11:42 AM
that frontiers article wasn't so hot (no real conclusion, way too much of the author's voice when it totally wasn't necessary for the article), but the facebook one and the one on Neuhaus especially were great.

fire your copy editor, though! awful mistakes throughout the print edition. luckily the content was good, so it's forgivable.
Posted by ehh: #3 (in reply to #2) · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 12:03 PM
The facebook article's content was interesting, but the article was meandering and didn't have any kind of analysis. It read like a book report, and consequently I was bored. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Posted by rick ross: #4 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 12:16 PM
i spit crack, every verse a ki
Posted by A sycophant: #5 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 12:25 PM
I have to say that I was a little dissapointed by the Frontiers article. Calling those of us who actually participated in class "sycophants" was a little insulting. I, for one, really enjoyed the course, and I think the displeasure voiced by many of my peers was due to a lack of effort on their part, not the responsibility of Helfand or the design of the course. The jist article seemed to criticize the course for lacking something like entertainment value, which I find to be a little strange. I don't go to seminars or lectures expecting the professor to "stimulate" or "engage" me as if I were attending a show or movie. I go to learn and participate, which generally provides all of the "stimulation" that I need. Granted, a skilled and passionate seminar leader can help (I had Dr. Gill), but I think that personal interest and engagement ultimately lies on the shoulders of the student.
Posted by Sycophant: #6 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 12:27 PM
*The jist OF THE article*

sorry.
Posted by rjt: #7 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 1:05 PM
*The GIST of the article*

no remorse.
Posted by I remember: #8 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 2:19 PM
Lydia asking a question at a FroSci lecture.

SYCOPHANT!! The Blue & White condemns you.
Posted by Rick Ross: #9 · reply ·
May 13, 2007 at 6:56 PM
Boss, it what i does

I get money eryday, eryday i does

Posted by I piloted: #10 · reply ·
May 14, 2007 at 1:12 AM
the course 4 years ago. Why oh why did I take a class with 9 am Friday lectures? And I didn't even get an all-star professor to lead my discussion section.

In retrospect, it was a harbinger of things to come... core classes taught by grad students, and Friday classes.

College, I want a refund.
Posted by comment: #11 · reply ·
May 14, 2007 at 9:19 AM
Frontiers was really not so bad. The neuroscience and astrophysics section of my course were excellent. I had a very good section leader.

Scientific Habits of Mind is an excellent book on some key aspects of the scientific method. (Read, for example, the stuff on regression to the mean). It is clear, and well-written, and deserves a wider audience than just Columbia students.

Name:
Email:
Reply to:

Describe this color in one lowercase word.

About Us

Bwog is compiled by the staff of The Blue and White, Columbia University's undergraduate magazine.

Contact Us

Please send tips to bwgossip@columbia.edu.

Questions or concerns? Email bweditors@columbia.edu.

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. Email bwog@columbia.edu.

In Print

Search

Comment Policy

Our Favorite Comments

What do you : [read]
"need if you're buying a musical instrument today? A Chopin Liszt!"
just to let you know: [read]
"it will be your significant other breaking up with you (because at other schools, there's actually an..."

Bwogroll

Technical

Our headlines are syndicated through Atom.
This site is powered by the Publicate Content Management System, which is available for free.
Our interface icons are from the free Silk set.