During the onslaught of the academic year, many students forgo newly released books for required reading or problem sets, making summer the perfect time to catch up on leisure reading. In a menial attempt to recapture the spirit of the literary salons during the 17th and 18th century, Bwog is introducing a book club for the summer. Though the internet pales in comparison with actual conversation, we are hoping to create an open space to foster thought and discussion.
All Bwog readers are welcome to participate. There will be a post in advance announcing the next selection. Generally, the works will be either contemporary fiction or nonfiction. The actual Book Club will take form as a dialogue between our two reviewers, Lucy Tang and Pierce Stanley, and the comments thread will allow readers to contribute to with questions or criticism or even a book suggestion. Because the book club is still in its nascence, nothing is concrete, and the more feedback, the better.
We have chosen The Mayor's Tongue to inaugurate this summer. The Mayor's Tongue is the debut from Nathaniel Rich, an editor at The Paris Review. There's been a lot of hubbub surrounding The Mayor's Tongue, because Rich hails from a literary lineage--his father is Frank Rich, the New York Times columnist, and brother Simon Rich is a well-established humor writer--and The Mayor's Tongue will determine if the legacy lives on. The book offers two narratives, related but never intertwined. The first sees Eugene Brentani, a young man obsessed with renowned author Constance Eakins, running off to Italy for the daughter of Eakins' biographer. The second narrative features Mr. Schmitz, a much older man, who loses his wife and struggles to maintain normalcy with his best friend Rutherford.
Take some time this weekend to open up The Mayor's Tongue and join us in a few days for our discussion. It's a fast read, we promise.

6 comments
Post a comment

Email this post
Ducking your head and barreling through the cloud of cigarette smoke outside Butler might be worth it tonight. Act fast and you can snag a copy of poli-lit-culture journal
Not the ex-bassist for
Forgive me if this seems insensitive, but for the last few years I have been thoroughly sick of hearing, talking, and thinking about 9/11. I was tired of pop-sociology articles and works of art still cropping up that explained just how we were changed forever. I was done with post-9/11 America and declared to many people that I was ready for the post-post-9/11 era. (As an aside, I would like to take this moment, on a blog, to coin this era the "double post.") Many sympathized with my viewpoint on this, and even more would probably support an expanded-scope restatement by a character in Don DeLillo's new book Falling Man: "We're all sick of America and Americans. The subject nauseates us."
In 2002, Michael Chabon lashed out against the modern short story, claiming that publications like The New Yorker are filled with nothing but the "quotidian, plotless, moment-of-truth revelatory story." He did this in a McSweeney's compendium, no less, giving the hipster literati two things to think about: 1) What the hell does "quotidian" mean? and 2) Whatever it is, it sounds pretty bad, so what should be done? The answers to these, via the internet and Chabon, respectively, are "everyday or commonplace," and "learn something from genre fiction." Genre fiction, if you can't guess, is fiction that conforms to an established genre—science fiction, fantasy, mystery, horror, etc. To paraphrase: your Tuesdays with Morrie would be a lot more interesting if the old fart's death turned him into a flesh-eating zombie, and you and a double-barreled shotgun were the only things between his bloodlust and your family. Put this way, I think we can all agree.
For most, summer is a season for skimpy bikinis and cold Coronas, or whatever those zany teenagers do these days. Along with such activities, Bwog staffers Lucy Tang and Daniel D'Addario will while away these months of freedom in (partial) devotion to literary pursuits, and then discussing these books in a nifty little feature called "Joy Luck Book Club."
Three Lives & Co.
Putting an iPod through the wash and receiving one of those "What are you doing with your life?" e-mails from my grandmother—as I did, one steely gray day in March—puts one in the mood to have absolute control over something. What I needed was books, and what I was going to do was judge them by their covers. Fired by the spirit of my grandmother and my own discontent, I walked the 100 feet from Carman to Lerner and strolled through the door, down the escalator and into the depths of the Columbia University Barnes and Noble.
As I stepped off the landing, I felt myself drawn towards the flashy colors of the New Arrivals section. One volume in particular caught my eye: Women & Money (by Suze Orman, $24.95). The cover's defining feature is Suze herself: amidst a bold white background, there she was, wearing a hideous pinstripe jacket, Winfreyesque quantities of makeup, and a lagomorphic smile that would put Brer Rabbit's dentist to shame. I was repulsed. Searching for one redeeming quality this book might have, I turned it over and instead unearthed this gem: "Why is it that women, who are so competent in all other areas of their lives, cannot find the same competence when it comes to money?" Clearly the answer, Suze, is because they don't buy your ugly, overpriced, blue-and-vomit-yellow book. 
Last night in
More stuff you shouldn't have saved on public computers.
Bwogger Anna Corke reports from work-study in the Art History department...
About Us
In Print
Search
Comment Policy
Bwogroll
Technical


Events